• mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Non-profits make profit all the time. The key difference between a for-profit and a non-profit is that a for-profit company takes that money and gives it to its owners, and a non-profit is legally required to reinvest that money in its organization or missions.

    Of course, non-profits can also do shitty things like nepo hires with vastly inflated salaries, throw parties and extravagant galas for “fundraising” and spent almost nothing on the charity aspect.

    This is why lots of rich fucks setup their own “philanthropy” organizations. They can dump their wealth into tax free and pay themselves and their heirs ungodly sums while paying for villas/jets/etc from the untaxed non-profit.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Correct? Those two are indeed separate countries with separate laws.

        My explanation of the above was just a general breakdown about how nonprofit and for-profits differ. It was certainly US centric, if that’s your critique.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m well aware of the foundation, and the fact that they have left him on the board with zero consequences or controls.

        Stating your ethics and then not enforcing them makes the statement pointless.

        • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          If your want to be hard headed about this, that’s your problem.

          Yan isn’t the only guy on the board of directors. The others are pretty fucking credible and knowledgeable people on the topic of privacy. They all make the decisions togetherness. And im pretty certain they’ll have the last word and steer Proton in the right direction.

          And again, no, it’s not because they have a free tier that they’ll collect and sell your private information. That goes against the core value of Proton and its directors.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Is it only me or is there some bandwagon effect on Proton hate these days?

            I get it that everyone, me included, thought that sucking up to donald is a shit move, but that’s about it. Proton is good.

            • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Totally. People are exaggerating. Proton really is a good service and the only real answer to Google where you have everything under one account.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            “State your ethics and then stand by them” is being hard headed?

            When the above is a bar too high for you to reach, that’s a you problem, mate.

            • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              You said

              Stating your ethics and then not enforcing them makes the statement pointless.

              Explain to me what ethics did they not enforce?

              Hint: none.