So, I’ve noticed a few posts making it to “all” from some some communities that are, shall we say, unsympathetic to the Israelis readarding the attacks over the weekend.

I don’t want to get into a row about the situation itself as you can have one of them anywhere online right now.

However, some of it slips into being supportive and almost enthusiastic about Hamas actions.

In quite a few countries, Hamas are a legally proscribed terrorist organisation, and support of them is specifically illegal. Therefore I’m wondering if there is any risk hosting federated content from these instances if you happen to live in said country and host a Lemmy instance. Lemm.ee for example being based in the EU where they are deemed as terrorists.

  • impiri@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Don’t worry, I just checked with the Internet Police and it’s fine

  • Elise@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Article 14 of the Directive 2000/31/EC states that hosts are not liable for material uploaded by users, unless they are aware of it.

    Edit: I should add that there’s a new set of regulations called the DSA, with new rules regarding moderation. Afaik it is mostly important for large established platforms though.

    • tallwookie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      does reporting the post qualify as creating awareness? if mods ignore the report due to laziness or political ideology, are they liable?

      • Elise@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well I’m not a lawyer, but I’d say it depends on the severity. Just be reasonable.

    • NuPNuA@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is there a way to report content on here to your instance mod rather than the mods of the specific community?

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          IIRC the other admin are probably more suited for user reports. This leaves sunaurus more time to focus on server admin stuff :)

    • NuPNuA@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      As I said, I’m not here to have a row about the morals of the situation, you can take that to a million other places right now. I’m asking about the risk to instances of material that’s illegal in the host nation being spread to them by federation.

  • Historical_General@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Interesting question.

    Would you mind stating your personal political bias if you have one in regard to this conversation?

    I’m only asking because there have been instances where people have tried to limit freedom of speech citing political risk or ‘extremism’ on lemm.ee, so I’m offering you an opportunity to get it all out here.

    • NuPNuA@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, I specifically said that’s not what this is about. I was interested in the legal ramifications as it pertains to federated networks and hosting. It’s an apoltical query. If you want a row, look elsewhere.

    • trespass@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      While some of the comments from commies are too far, just because you disagree with how Israel treats Palestinians doesn’t make you a Nazi.

      You can approach this situation with more nuance than a choice between “Jews bad” or “Muslims bad”.

      • Historical_General@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’ll add that this conflict is not a religious conflict. Religion adds some heat but it is fundamentally about settler colonialism, theft of land, racism and apartheid.

        The former Palestinian leader Arafat’s wife is literally a Palestinian Christian. And Hamas, an Islamist organisation was literally funded by the Mossad against the PLO (Arafat’s organisation). What Israel faced is literally their own fault - it’s blowback like how the US got 911ed by the Saudis they funded.

        • trespass@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Fair point, I oversimplified a bit. Sounds a bit more of a nationalism issue?

          • Historical_General@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Land is what’s at stake, when people are removed from their land or displaced, that constitutes genocide, keeping them under a seperate set of law while favouring Jews: apartheid (literally worse than South Africa, because the whites actually needed low wage workers while Israelis just carry on killing).

            All of that comes under settler-colonialism, but certainly nationalism is part of the agenda.

        • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Much unlike the Israeli defense ministers statement of “palestinians beasts are subhumans” which definitely doesn’t sound like Nazi propaganda oh wait

        • trespass@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Again, you’re painting with a broad brush. Nazism and antisemitism are frequently associated but mutually exclusive.

          And one person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter.

            • trespass@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              All I’m asking for is a bit of nuance beyond “communists are saying nazi things”. Being similar is not being the same. You’re implying that Palestinians are Nazis, which is… a tremendous stretch.

              • Historical_General@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Also just wrong, since both Jewish Zionists and Nazis were inspired by European colonialism. (Important to note there are Christian Zionists out there, and the original British Upper Class Christian Zionists basically just wanted the Jews out of Europe).

              • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                “Communists are saying Nazi things”? I’m not sure where I talked about communists besides the opposition to it in Hamas.

                And no, I’m not implying Palestinians are Nazis - I’m responding to the claim that Hamas isn’t fascist just because there’s more to fascism than antisemitism. Yes, antisemitism does not imply fascism. But antisemitism combined with a few other factors does imply fascism. (And no, fascism does not imply antisemitism).

                And it’s certainly not a stretch to claim a subset of a group is fascist. Like this Palestinian on the left (who is also instrumentalized by Israeli fascists to claim all Palestinians are Nazis - which is obviously wrong, but this guy certainly was one):

                Also, just a small definition: I use the terms Nazi and fascist interchangeably, there’s not much of a point here to argue semantics.

            • Historical_General@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Yeah, that’s why Mossad funded them. If they were Islamist, they’d be easier to control like the Saudis and friends. The PLO were left secularist and led by a man married to a Christian Palestinian.

              By the way Israel is more viciously nationalist, fascist and anti-communist.

              • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Never said anything positive about Israel, did I? I responded to a comment saying just because Hamas is antisemitic doesn’t mean it’s fascist. While that’s true, Hamas fulfills more hallmarks of fascism than merely antisemitism.

                • Historical_General@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Well, I wasn’t criticising you personally. I was adding some important, interesting and peculiar context.

                  Don’t you find it wierd that Israelis were more interested in weakening a disciplined left secular party and inviting corrupt terrorists to power instead? I mean obviously, if Palestine ever were to be free, the business class don’t want them to be left secular nor independant.

                  Personally I don’t think Hamas should be compared to fascists, the term obscures the unique problems in the Middle East between different factions, who fall in and out of favour with the chief meddler in the region (US). But it doesn’t really matter.

        • zaph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The problem is that Isreal is doing terrorist shit too and it has nothing to do with the fact that they’re Jewish.