• FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This proactive approach helps to avert potential engine damage

    Ah yes, the old “you’re too stupid to do anything by yourself, so we kindly prevent you from trying”

    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is why it was removed from auto transmissions, people would overfill their transmissions and it would froth up and burn out the clutches.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I would argue that it adds a new failure point, and a catastrophic one at that.

      Yes, many hunans don’t monitor their oil properly. I’ve seen some destroy engines because they thought the low oil light could be ignored for a week.

      Even if you still had the dipstick, owners would become reliant on the sensor and grenade the engine when it gets it wrong. Remember how Teslas had hoods that flew open while driving? The problem wasn’t the latch. The problem was owners relying on a crappy sensor.