• ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I wouldn’t categorize it that way at all. It extrapolated nationality to one’s employer and religion to the law. It was unsubtle in its views of classism and such, in a way that I appreciated, but it wasn’t just doing zany things “just because”, unless you’ve got a good example that’s slipping my mind.

    • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      My critique is not of the content itself but rather it’s presentation, and its over reliance on what I can only call “millennial humor”.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I can’t say I follow you. I would call it satire rather “totally random”, but if you didn’t care for the writing, you didn’t care for the writing.