• reflex@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Like the other guy, I also read your comment twice looking for mistakes but found none.
    You should of left something to fix!
    😏

    Edit: I’m glad there so many people who are as passionate about the correct spelling of “should’ve” as I am. I was testing you all, and you passed!

    • ironhydroxide@partizle.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correcting the reviewer.
      Notes: “should of” isn’t valid, should implies a verb, of isn’t a verb. I expect you meant “should have”. Please recall this in future submissions.

      • wandermind@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        They should of course keep that in mind, but it’s not that “should” should always be followed by a verb directly. The problem is that “of” in this context is a mishearing/spelling of “have”, so they should in this case have written it like that instead.

        • jadero@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would argue that “should of” is just a naive written rendition of the spoken contraction “should’ve”. They are homophones, so it’s a completely understandable error among those without the relevant education or background. I know only English and was in Grade 9 at a different school before someone corrected me.

      • reflex@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Notes: “should of” isn’t valid, should implies a verb, of isn’t a verb. I expect you meant “should have”. Please recall this in future submissions.

        😏

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        should implies a verb, of isn’t a verb

        “should” and “of” should probably be in quotes here?

        • LinuxSBC@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A question mark does not fit the sentence, which is a statement (“they should.” rather than “should they?”). While question marks are commonly used to demonstrate a rising tone at the end of a sentence, its not considered correct for formal writing.

          • interolivary@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            A-ha, but this most decidedly not formal writing! UNO REVERSE CARD.

            But on a more serious note, I did intend it as a sort of question because I’m not 100% sure, because the rules for quote use might well be different in English than my native language. I actually also don’t know the rule for question mark usage in English; is it generally considered a crime against orthography to plonk a question mark on something that’s a statement, or is it valid in some cases?

            • LinuxSBC@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s totally valid in most cases. It’s technically only supposed to be used for a question, but language is based on how it’s most commonly used, with those “rules” only applying in extremely formal situations. With the prevalence of informal text-based communication, many people use it to indicate being unsure, like how you used it. I just wanted to continue the chain of grammar corrections (which is why I used the wrong “its”/“it’s” at one point). Also, you were right about the quotes.

              • interolivary@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s technically only supposed to be used for a question, but language is based on how it’s most commonly used

                Ah, I see you’re also a descriptivist 😀

                But yeah I know you were just continuing the joke; I’m a language nerd (well, general nerd really) and I just got curious about what the rule actually is. While English orthography rules related to punctuation usually seem to be pretty much the same as with Finnish, the rule for question marks seems to be more relaxed in Finnish because it can “officially” be used to mark any expression as a question. The rules for commas are also different, ours are closer to German and we tend to spray commas everywhere