Not really, this was the paradigm on Mac for ages. That’s also why there are three different ways for a Mac app to “become fullscreen” and they have different behavior, because they kept patching on top of the default workflow
True, but Mac users are the least flexible computer users of all time.
Apple changes two pixels in an icon or introduces a new default window snapping size and the hosts of ATP record a 5 hour long podcast episode abou this ruined the world and permanently broke their workflow.
Ok, but we’re talking about GNOME here and you’re saying that somehow GNOME copied Apple on this, but it really isn’t the case. GNOME apps pretty much all do go full screen. And the paradigm for over a decade has been this way.
Ok but that’s a skills issue on the part of the user, a PEBKAC. Not the fault of the environment.
Not really, this was the paradigm on Mac for ages. That’s also why there are three different ways for a Mac app to “become fullscreen” and they have different behavior, because they kept patching on top of the default workflow
Perhaps, but it also hasn’t been like that for like a whole ass decade.
True, but Mac users are the least flexible computer users of all time.
Apple changes two pixels in an icon or introduces a new default window snapping size and the hosts of ATP record a 5 hour long podcast episode abou this ruined the world and permanently broke their workflow.
Ok, but we’re talking about GNOME here and you’re saying that somehow GNOME copied Apple on this, but it really isn’t the case. GNOME apps pretty much all do go full screen. And the paradigm for over a decade has been this way.
I said nothing of the sort.
You’re right, you personally didn’t, but thats the thread we’re talking about right now.
Exactly. I didn’t. I suggest reading usernames before commenting.
And I suggest understanding the context of thread on which you comment.