Someone mentioned this before but the headlines for this story is very misleading. Now ArsTechnica have added “android-based” like that makes a difference…
They do A-B headlines, so it’s probable that you’ve seen the B headline previously. The URL for the story is from the A headline, which includes “android-based”, so that was always part of the A headline.
You’re absolutely right that the headline is misleading, though. The issue is ROMs, not “gaming handhelds”
Someone mentioned this before but the headlines for this story is very misleading. Now ArsTechnica have added “android-based” like that makes a difference…
They do A-B headlines, so it’s probable that you’ve seen the B headline previously. The URL for the story is from the A headline, which includes “android-based”, so that was always part of the A headline.
You’re absolutely right that the headline is misleading, though. The issue is ROMs, not “gaming handhelds”
Besides the fact many of them are Linux based…