Who, Me?: ‘This, many considered, was bad’

  • MHLoppy@fedia.ioOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    Eh, that assumes that all posts are news posts. When I first saw this headline I didn’t assume it was current news, but I’m also familiar with the “Who, Me?” column I guess.

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      In communities like this, yes, it’s generally assumed that it’s current events.

      • MHLoppy@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s not the precedent set by other similar, recent submissions though, - nobody complained about this other submission talking about an event in 2004 (also ~20 years ago): https://lemmy.world/post/32137161

        If you want to police submitting to this community with an unwritten rule about editorializing titles to include chronological information:

        • get the rule added to the sidebar instead of assuming people can somehow figure it out when there’s no existing evidence of this precedent
        • enforce it consistently

        It’s not my favorite thing to have a few people who don’t even make submissions getting upset at me for following the diabolical process of (1) reading the rules, (2) looking at previous submissions, and (3) copying a title verbatim from a reasonable source. If there’s something that people are expected to follow, make it a written rule or give me access to your secret mind-reading device. This community isn’t called sysadmin_news so I’m not sure how I’m reasonably expected to know this.