• SolarPunker@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Every city should host main public web servicies for its citizens, each one as an instance of a complex system, that’s how anarchy works.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      That quickly becomes a tragedy of the commons. The city residents pay for it but how do you verify “citizenship”?

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If you mean citizenship as being associated to the city whose hosting services you are using, yhe power or water bill pointed at your name and residence should be able to do that. Now, if you want that plus anonimity, the only practical option I can think of for a city-wide physical campaign is some sort of GPG Signature Meetup (“signature party”).

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          yhe power or water bill pointed at your name and residence

          Many people live in cities without owning their house. So they never see those bills. Renters are usually two levels away from the actual owner. Then there are all the people who live and work in cities but aren’t official renters.

          • rmrf@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            In the USA, most power bills are the tenants’ responsibility. In the USA, virtually all internet connections are the tenants’ responsibility.

            The locality hosting the services could also pass a law requiring the tenants to either bear responsibilities for, or be included in, all utility related billing.

            A lot of arguments in this thread seem to be ignoring this as a solution to the legitimate problems they’re raising.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          It would have to be a national mandate that is available in every city or everyone would use the free service from one city but not vote to raise the taxes in their city to pay for their own.

          If it’s a national mandate, then might as well make it a national service.

    • th3raid0r@tucson.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hi! This is what I’m trying to do with tucson.social. Wish the city would get back to me. I don’t want to own/operate Tucson.social alone perpetually. Lol.

      It would allow me to expand to a lot more community services outside of social media, chat, and Meetup platforms.

      There’s dozens of us! Dozens!