• TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    The previous iterations of LLMs is not even that close enough to be called AI unlike the current ones we have right now. In many years to come, the AI will improve.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      26 days ago

      There’s plenty of room for improvement in the theory and application of any type of LLM. I think we’re closer to a plateau than people want to admit. The power and water needs scale wildly upward for slight performance increases. We need to go about this wildly differently for it to be sustainable.

    • frostysauce@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      If what we have now can be accurately called AI then what we’ve had for 20+ years could accurately be called AI.

      But neither actually should be called that.