• SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would encourage you to re-read because I did cover exactly what you’re mentioning here and it seems like you might have stopped reading after the second paragraph.

    the “healthy” variant

    This is what was meant by the “mythical neurotypical”

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I encourage you to not understand everything as an opposition to what you wrote. I was adding to your point. But if you insist on a fight, I will allow you to choose time, place and weapon.

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You started with adding three opposing definitions of blindness and then did the arguably worst thing of creating a single “blindness spectrum” that you call “vision”.

        What you wrote isn’t adding to my message, it’s in direct opposition in a lot of ways and shows that you didn’t stop to understand what was being said before “adding” to it.

        I think we do agree with the “everything is a spectrum” part, but my whole point could maybe be best summarized as “reality is a spectrum, classifications and language are not”

        So I guess we’re fighting now. Meet me at the Brooks river at the end of the month, it’s a fish slapping contest, you’ll recognize me as #901 here