I have been thinking about switching to brave for better fingerprinting protection

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Firefox. Or if you don’t want to spend time configuring it, Librewolf.

  • freddy@lemmy.oneM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    We recommend just switching to Brave and disabling the ‘crytpo crap’ yourself rather than using a fork that is liable to go unmaintained and miss updates.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So much this. I’ve seen countless of spite forks. Very few of them merged the updates.

      Even large projects like Electron can’t keep up with chromium, and then there is downstream crap like Discord that can’t even keep up witch Electron.

  • Mario Bariša@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    At that point just use Firefox / Librewolf, os just turn off all of the brave rewards crap ( crypto )…

  • fenndev@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why not use Librewolf? Fork of Firefox, hardened and resists fingerprinting. Scores pretty damn well on https://privacytests.org and pairs well with Mull on Android.

    AFAIK there are no actively developed Brave forks.

    • Mihuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And there won’t be because brave doesn’t like it when someone forks the browser.

    • WeLoveCastingSpelz@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use librewolf on my work laptop it removes all cookies every time you close it, this wouldn’t be a problem on mobile as I already set my phone browser(fennec) to do that but on my personal computer it crosses the border from I can deal with it to too inconvenient

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Almost all of my Linux devices have both chromium-browser and Firefox installed. Firefox is my default, but there are some apps out there that work a lot better in something chromium-based.

          • animist@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thank you for sharing this, I was unaware. I wonder if any of this has been addressed recently as the linked article is two years old (not demeaning its value, just wondering if the devs saw the article and decided to improve ungoogled-chromium).

            • stonemilker@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, that’s why I pointed out that I haven’t used it in a couple years, I have no idea about the direction development took after that, so maybe some folks that work on the development of Chromium and its many forks can give us some insight. Personally, I just decided to stick to Firefox tweaked with Arkenfox as my main browser on desktop and I have Brave with all its annoyances turned off as a backup option

          • rmicielski@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No one is going to develop exploits only for a browser with certain default security options disabled (especially these made at compile time using toolchain). Binary exploitation is hard, and extremely not worth the effort in this case.

            • dngray@lemmy.oneM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Disabling CRLSets though is worrisome, and its binaries are built by potentially unknown third parties with compromised systems.

    • BrikoX@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brave might have started as a basic Chromium fork, but the various privacy/security features they added do make them standout now.

      • SatyrSack@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is really disingenuous to say “X is just a skin of Y” just because they share the same browser engine or are forked from the same browser. Like you say, there are a lot of changes.

          • underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It depends. Many addons have effects that can be tested for and fingerprinted, but it’s not always straight forward. There’s a way to detect any specific chrome extension, but doesn’t work on firefox because it uses unique extension ids per person.

            With addons like CanvasBlocker, they generate random values for a bunch of apis like canvas. So each time you will look unique, but it changes every time so you’re not easily tracked. I’d assume it’s similar to what Brave does, but I haven’t looked into the details. Some stuff isn’t randomized by default, so they can get info like timezone and languages, but probably not enough to give you a unique identity.

  • nomadic@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you want Brave without the crypto crap then spend a minute or two and turn it all off in settings. You’ll never see it again.

    • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And the setting really does work. The crap is completely gone afterwards. There is no grayed out symbols, or nag screens or anything.

    • DuckGuy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or more accurately: can be turned on. Everything crypto is disabled by default.

      • BrikoX@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Functionality wise yes, but it’s visible in the UI and frontpage and that can be disabled/removed .

  • Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree the crypto stuff is super annoying, but it’s a really nice and clean browser after you disable all that and tweak the settings (which you’d probably want to go through and configure with a new browser anyway)

    • 𝕷𝖎𝖉@lemmy.comfysnug.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      even as a crypto user & dev, brave’s crypto shit is annoying af, it’s inferior by far to what everyone else uses & they push it on ur face & make u have to remove it.

      i’d rather just use firefox or even microsoft edge, even for crypto stuff

      • imrichyouknow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are less invasive on the privacy front, but they also push their products much harder down user’s throat due to less revenue from less accurate ads, just look at DDG’s frontpage.

        I also found them self-censoring towards IPs from China, albeit this could be the direct result of using Bing’s search results.

        It’s much easier to compare it with something like SearXNG which has the same core principle, without ads, without censorships, without invasive marketing.

  • xe3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can just disable it in settings, fairly easily. This is preferable to searching for an obscure fork of brave (for me personally).