• yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    These were the jobs most people thought would be replaced first, not the creative ones, how the tables turn.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Some of that turn is physical plant. Kitchens, especially, are built to serve human forms, where tech solutions to food prep would rather be stand-alone boxes. It’s a far harder problem to make a robot that uses a restaurant’s existing grills, ovens, and deep fryers than it is to make a box that turns out perfect french fries. It’s a riskier proposal for a restaurant to replace its fry station, where a human can make fries, onion rings, egg rolls, or whatever new fad hits tiktok, with a fries-and-rings-only box with less than 10 years commercial proof. Generative AI, for all its faults, is just code that runs on a computer you already have, or maybe in a cloud service with zero physical footprint. Relative to replacing your barista with a vending machine, trying ChatGPT for a quarter or two is practically zero risk.

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yup, I figured service jobs would be some of the last to go honestly. Replacing a person that works at a desk on a computer all day with a computer is just cutting out the middle man. Replacing someone that requires a lot of physical ability to move around and manipulate objects requires tech that doesn’t live in the cloud.

        And considering I’ve been reading about AI taking other jobs for the last year or more, I guess they kinda are the last to go. Now we just sit back and watch it accelerate. Either get UBI or a revolution that leads to UBI. Or the cyberpunk future the oligarchs plan to leave us with as they set their power hungry sights on Mars.