tst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前ISPs complain that listing every fee is too hard, urge FCC to scrap new rulearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down18cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1external-linkISPs complain that listing every fee is too hard, urge FCC to scrap new rulearstechnica.comtst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square99fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up186arrow-down1·2 年前Let me get this right… they’re lobbying their way out to not even list what they’re charging for? I hope FCC doubles down without lube.
minus-squarelemmyvore@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 年前Yeah how does that even work? Don’t they have to list what they sell for their accounting? Isn’t it tax evasion or fraud if they don’t keep track of everything?
minus-squareDMmeYourNudes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 年前It’s about transparency to the customer at point of sale. It’s like nutrition facts for your internet, literally.
minus-squareLiiTheBaddie@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Probably means an itemized fee list instead of a generic one that has it all added together and just shows up as “fees” on the bill
Let me get this right… they’re lobbying their way out to not even list what they’re charging for?
I hope FCC doubles down without lube.
Yeah how does that even work? Don’t they have to list what they sell for their accounting? Isn’t it tax evasion or fraud if they don’t keep track of everything?
It’s about transparency to the customer at point of sale. It’s like nutrition facts for your internet, literally.
Probably means an itemized fee list instead of a generic one that has it all added together and just shows up as “fees” on the bill