• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    They make glaring errors in logic, and confidently state things that are not true. But their whole “deal” is writing proper sentences based on predictive models. They don’t make mistakes like the excerpt highlighted.

    • drislands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Y’know what, that’s a fair point. Though I’m not the original commenter from the top, heh.

    • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m imagining that the first output didn’t cover everything they wanted so they tweaked it and pasted the results together and fucked it up.

    • GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty soon glaring errors like this will be the only way to identify human vs LLM writing.

      Then soon after that the LLMs will start producing glaring grammatical errors to match the humans.