• kinkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t think anyone will disagree with you about unsupervised OTA updates.

    To your first point- I agree that any update that changes the behavior of any fundamental system in a car is pretty reckless. Especially ones that increase a car’s acceleration, which Tesla historically does. I don’t know why those sorts of updates aren’t being regulated harder. OTA updates should be for mundane things like infotainment updates or, in more serious cases, to fix systems that aren’t functioning properly. It shouldn’t otherwise be used to alter how the car functions as a car, especially when these updates largely happen silently or the changes are tucked into some changelog that the owner doesn’t have to read.

    However, to your second point, cars are smart now and there’s no going back. So cars do need software updates to close attack vectors.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      However, to your second point, cars are smart now and there’s no going back. So cars do need software updates to close attack vectors.

      He’s not saying that cars shouldn’t be updated… But that OTA updates are a problem. They’re saying that it should be a drive to the dealership to do an update. I would go a step further and make it possible to have it opt-in for car manufacturer to send out cd/usbs to update firmware.

      Offline updates are generally fine and not super susceptible to general hacking. OTA on the other hand… that’s a massive risk for a reward of… slightly faster fix times?

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        If it’s a safety system, it might be “have the car taken to the dealership on a flatbed truck”. Also, some people don’t live near a dealership.

        Like it or not, all modern cars are connected - for the maps if nothing else - and if a car is capable of an OTA update, I say do it. I don’t see how a dealership adds anything other than cost which will always discourage updates from being made at all.

        And I actually think physical updates are easier - connect a laptop to the ECU, and you’re done. It’s generally only OTA updates that use code signing/etc.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          all modern cars are connected - for the maps if nothing else

          Carplay and Android Auto are better than any other in built infotainment shit. I do not see this as valid. Nor that does mean that firmware on the car should be writable from those systems.

          I don’t see how a dealership adds anything other than cost which will always discourage updates from being made at all.

          Thus why I said…

          I would go a step further and make it possible to have it opt-in for car manufacturer to send out cd/usbs to update firmware.

          Then any dick or harry can do it on their own.

          But honestly whenever I say “dealer” I really mean any repair shop.