• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Even if you trust that one feature will actually be disabled, that was just one example.

      Do you really believe you can disable and remove all of the numerous data collection and spyware components that are baked into all aspects of the OS?

      I’m not saying no one should use Windows 11, but they should be honest with themselves about the trade-off they’re accepting.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Even if you trust that one feature will actually be disabled, that was just one example.

        The other one mentioned was the start menu ads. Those can also be turned off with a simple toggle in the settings. Finding this was as simple as Googling “turn off windows start menu ads”, it was the top result.

        Do you really believe you can disable and remove all of the numerous data collection and spyware components that are baked into all aspects of the OS?

        Yes. Because Windows is used by a lot of big giant corporations that would sue the hell out of Microsoft if it wasn’t possible to disable those features.

        • Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          First of all, there are specialised Enterprise distributions of M$ Windows. Furthermore, what ground would any company have to sue M$ on what the latter put in their own operating system?

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I work for a big giant corporation and plenty of its computers don’t run Enterprise Windows.

            A lawsuit would come in the case that Microsoft was lying about whether you could disable those features. Microsoft has put toggles for them into the settings, if it turns out that those toggles don’t actually disable the things they claim to disable then that’s where Microsoft is going to face legal issues. Do you really think Microsoft cares enough about the tiny portion of their customer base that’s going to change the default settings that they would risk that sort of lawsuit to “spy” on them?

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes. Just like you can turn off a bunch of the windows 10 crap with registry keys and tools. Why. Why does a user need to go to such lengths to make their OS they paid for not soy on them and deliver them ads?

      “Oh it’s not that bad!” You’ll say. Ya. Windows 10 wasn’t THAT bad for it. Then came 11. Then 12 will come. Inch by inch it will turn to shit more and more, and that is the point.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        But this really isn’t a registry key or tool, though. Did you click my link? It’s a simple on/off toggle in the system settings menu. You just open the settings and click “off.” I don’t see how much simpler they could make it.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          You need to consider the bigger picture. Not this specific thing.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I haven’t had to edit the registry in as long as I can remember. Not just for this specific thing. What stuff are you talking about?

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I trust that Microsoft fears the lawsuits that would ensue if they were caught lying about it, and that they wouldn’t derive any significant benefit from lying about it. Why would they?