• 312@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Especially considering the way twitter counts a “view” is if the tweet shows up in your app’s viewport, at all. So simply scrolling through the timeline consumes “views” - you could run up against this limit in 10-15 minutes of scrolling.

    It’s incredibly stupid.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what I was wondering. I don’t use Twitter so 600 sounds like a lot but I was wondering how much it actually was. Someone else said they blew through it in like 15 minutes

      • redimk@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        15 minutes if you actually read the tweets, but when this “reading limit” is actually “impression limit”, and Twitter counts an impression as a tweet just loading on your feed (I didn’t know this). About 2 minutes of continuous scrolling gets you rate limited.

      • Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.mlB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And sounds like it’s implemented in a api-request=view way. I’m not sure how much requests the JS makes per view but im sure it’s more than one.