UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoPhilosopher tries to convince ChatGPT that it's consciousyoutu.beexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up116arrow-down178
arrow-up1-62arrow-down1external-linkPhilosopher tries to convince ChatGPT that it's consciousyoutu.beUraniumBlazer@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squareJustARaccoon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down4·3 months agoYou cannot convince something that has no consciousness, it’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt
minus-squareUraniumBlazer@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down23·3 months ago You cannot convince something that has no consciousness Why not? It’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt And why can’t that be intelligence? What does it mean to be “convinced”? What does consciousness even mean? Making definitive claims like these on terms whose definitions we do not understand isn’t logical.
minus-squaresugartits@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·3 months ago You cannot convince something that has no consciousness Why not? Logic. It’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt And why can’t that be intelligence? For the same reason I can’t get a date with Michelle Ryan: it’s a physical impossibility.
minus-squareUraniumBlazer@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down11·3 months ago Logic Please explain your reasoning. For the same reason I can’t get a date with Michelle Ryan: it’s a physical impossibility. Huh?
minus-squaresugartits@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months ago Logic Please explain your reasoning. Others have done this and you seem to be ignoring them, so not sure what the point of you asking is. Go look at some of the code that AI is powered by. It’s just parameters. Lots and lots of parameters. Then the output from that is inevitable. For the same reason I can’t get a date with Michelle Ryan: it’s a physical impossibility. Huh? If you’re too lazy to even look up the most basic thing you don’t understand, then I guess we’re done here.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-23 months ago It’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt And why can’t that be intelligence? Because human intelligence does far more than respond to prompts with the average response from a data set.
You cannot convince something that has no consciousness, it’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt
Why not?
And why can’t that be intelligence?
What does it mean to be “convinced”? What does consciousness even mean?
Making definitive claims like these on terms whose definitions we do not understand isn’t logical.
Logic.
For the same reason I can’t get a date with Michelle Ryan: it’s a physical impossibility.
Please explain your reasoning.
Huh?
Others have done this and you seem to be ignoring them, so not sure what the point of you asking is.
Go look at some of the code that AI is powered by. It’s just parameters. Lots and lots of parameters. Then the output from that is inevitable.
If you’re too lazy to even look up the most basic thing you don’t understand, then I guess we’re done here.
Because human intelligence does far more than respond to prompts with the average response from a data set.