For months, the Erica Marsh account had raised suspicions among online misinformation experts due to her lack of a real-world footprint and her devotion to attention-grabbing viewpoints one called “cartoonishly liberal.”

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, it has to do with politics. Faking identities has been a thing since early chat rooms, and the article doesn’t go into any technological breakthrough they used. It was pretty much just social engineering.

    • Itty53@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There you go again, pretending technology only has to do with the next breakthrough. I mean did you read what I wrote? I literally talked about that explicitly.

      Technology is technology. If it’s relevant today then why shouldn’t it be here? If the US was constructing water wheels again all of the sudden it would be a technology topic and relevant to this sub.

      If you don’t like it and you’re leaving, great. There’s the door, what makes you think anyone cares? Or ought to?

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        On a technicality point of course not.

        On a point of quality you’d basically flood the community with threads most people aren’t interested in on that logic. And probably turn technology into an American Politics/News community.

        It’s too low a bar to be considered technology. It’s not even going into how twitter allowed it to happen. It’s just the fact this one user exists and talks about politics.

        • Itty53@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Be the change you want to see then brother, post what quality content you think ought to be seen and shared. You’re allowed to.

            • Itty53@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you admitting you don’t even contribute and yet you deign to judge the people who do?

              • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure do. I don’t see any issue with doing that. If it’s a healthy community there shouldn’t be any reason to justify low quality content on it.

                • Itty53@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Big “I’m the main character” energy here. Enjoy yourself, because people around you don’t.

                  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Not taking main character by any means. Are you saying the community just shouldn’t be moderated for low quality content?

                    Besides you’re the one who went the route of focusing on my character specifically, whereas I was arguing for the community.

                    Hell this discussion was about the community until you started turning it onto me, brother

                    Anyway will just not respond any further, since I’m pretty sure this entire discussion has run it’s course and let’s face it: none of what either of us are saying has to do with the topic or the community at this point anyway…

                  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Not taking main character by any means. Are you saying the community just shouldn’t be moderated for low quality content?

                    Besides you’re the one who went the route of focusing on my character specifically, whereas I was arguing for the community.