I’m pretty sure they try to upstream as much as possible. They have made some pretty large upstream contributions which started out in their own fork.
What I feel is missing from the practical suggestions section: why cache images at all? They should be stored on the server they were uploaded to, and nowhere else. The image URL would be attached to the post, and could then be used by clients to fetch the image from the original server.
I thought lemmy did this, but it seems not (any more?).
You’re not going to have much luck finding a search engine with good results that doesn’t depend on google or bing. Kagi is no different. Using a searx instance is probably best if you’re looking for something without official agreements with bing or google. Edit: Here is a list of independent search indexes I just discovered in another thread https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/03/10/search-engines-with-own-indexes/
The article is pure fluff. (even includes “synergy”). Most sentences don’t mean anything. Was this maybe just AI generated?
Regarding the topic: if people wanted this feature, it would already have been implemented. It’s not like the topic is obscure, or that it’s difficult to implement.
The reply is about microsoft being even worse.
I’ve seen it in private browsing for a while now, but it has also just started happening in a normal window. My solution was to switch to ddg for now. Disabling js breaks image browsing for me.
I think the important part is that the syntax will become standardised, rather than being defined by microsoft/typescript, potentially allowing for alternative implementations. It could also make the build step optional in some cases, which is something people dislike about typescript currently.
oh no! not unmaintained! The unmaintenance gremlins are going to implement so many bugs and vulnerabilities!
I don’t think this is an “Arch is bad” post, but rather a “Void is good post”. I think the sticker is remove because it’s not relevant to them anymore.
Huh interesting. In Scotland we had another one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haggis_(programming_language)
Started for me at 21. Also terrible with names, but I’ve never thought of that being related.
It should be held back. Although I dislike the company, I believe safari’s market share and use of an alternative browser engine is important in keeping google from closing the web.
Unlike many comments here, I enjoyed reading the article, especially the parts in the “I don’t want to use gibibyte!” chapter, where you explain that this (the pedantry) is important in technical and formal situations (such as documentation). Seeing some of the comments here, I think it would have helped to focus on this aspect a bit more.
I also liked the extra part explaining the reasoning for using the Nokia E60.
I don’t quite agree with the recommendation to use base 10 SI units where neither KiB or kB would result in nice numbers. I don’t see why base 10 should have an influence on computers, and I think it makes more sense to stick to a single unit, such as KiB.
The reasons I have this opinion are probably to do with:
p.s, I agree with other commenters that your comments starting with “Pretty obvious that you didn’t read the article.” or similar are probably not helping your case… I understand that some comments here have been quite frustrating though.
I think it’s just normal Lua code.
Here’s a quick json converter (based on https://stackoverflow.com/a/55575074), assuming you have lua installed:
local function to_json(obj)
local result = {}
for key, value in pairs(obj) do
if type(value) == "string" then
value = string.format("\"%s\"", value)
elseif type(value) == "table" then
value = to_json(value)
end
table.insert(result, string.format("\"%s\":%s", key, value))
end
return "{" .. table.concat(result, ",") .. "}"
end
function item(obj)
print(to_json(obj))
end
dofile(arg[1])
It just defines the item
function to print json, and executes the data file.
arg[1]
, the first command line argument, is the path to the data file:
$ lua to_json.lua path/to/datafile.list
and pipe the output to something.json
or whatever else you want to do.
I think the second part of the comment is what’s important:
If you are in a more comfortable environment you will be better at working
Maybe that is windows for you. I have barely ever used windows, so the concept of searching for installers online and running them just seems clunky and time consuming to me. It’s just not what I’m used to.
However if you are willing to learn multiple systems, you might find that one is better than the others.
I usually get 5-10 Mbps download during peak times, which is enough for 720p YT and decent video calls. I really don’t understand why people always need faster and faster internet. Although I just checked, and I’m getting 60 down just now, which is way more than I have ever seen.
Which one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_about_the_Titanic