I’m sure it’s possible, but maybe this is a good time to reflect on what that would mean for the experience. Sure, maybe you wouldn’t mind, and maybe some other users who do would filter them out client side, but personally it feels like ads even if they start innocuous, eventually evolve into something invasive, deceptive, or both. At a certain point, if people aren’t clicking through and buying, the advertisers aren’t making money. It becomes almost a predatory relationship with the host trying to squeeze money out of the users whatever way they can.

Maybe not everyone could, but I feel a lot of people would rather throw in a few bucks a month to keep the lights on rather than deal with that.

Wild when you think about it… Twitter is supported by ads. The more you are on Twitter the more ads you theoretically will see, making the adspace more valuable. Additionally, the more trouble users experience the less they want to use/interact with the service. Isn’t such a small and arbitrary cap sort of kneecapping themselves?

I’m assuming the Twitter servers are on figurative fire and this is the only way they can deal short term, because I have a hard time seeing the benefit for them.

Same sentiment, going to take some work but nothing wrong if it stays a bit different. Digging the decentralization and hoping that means that it can keep a community feel for longer, even as the total number of users in the fediverse grows!

I am testing out Jerboa, got a similar feel but missing a few creature comforts. Seems the developer is really working to update and smooth the roughness in the last month so I’m optimistic long term. I’d give it a try!