“Climate crisis is making things slightly too warm for comfort”
Oh my. How bothersome.
I know you didn’t mean it that way, just the understatement had me cackling.
“Climate crisis is making things slightly too warm for comfort”
Oh my. How bothersome.
I know you didn’t mean it that way, just the understatement had me cackling.
The idiot digs deeper, and shows his true colours. Asinine.
No. We get exactly what his comment is about.
If he was in the renewables camp, there would be no point, in this discussion over solar, to bring up nuclear. It’s absolutely unrelated.
What he’s doing is pushing the thought into people’s heads that nuclear is a good solution, and that’s why I’m calling him out for. For being a shill.
These are his policies:
rent freeze, making city buses free and raising taxes on the most wealthy
If this goes ahead in NY, you can be damn sure that it’s going to stir the pot.
Millions thrown away just so he can fold over.
The US PACs system is absolutely broken…
Like with tobacco, the ones who had no doubt about the ill effects were the insurance companies.
They measure the impact in dollars, and the math is clear.
If he was a (us) football star he’d have gotten a scholarship instead.
Looks like they moved on to the fireworks business.
I have no idea how people with multiple animals can keep their houses clean. I struggle with regular dust and my own mess…
I’m sure that if they just keep looking, they’ll find… Nope, it’s more white, male, republicans.
I cannot, for the life of me, understand how you can kill 350 people and then just buy your way out of it.
This money isn’t even for the victims families, it’s a fucking bribe to get the gov to shield them from consequences.
This is wrong on so many levels - fucking executives need to go to jail over this!
If they’re not going to be responsible for their fuck ups, Boeing airworthiness needs to be revoked around the world. When they come crashing down over US politicians heads, then maybe they’ll learn.
He never said they aren’t going to kill anyone.
He said they aren’t going to kill many.
Which is true, up until a bunch of people pull guns, and then they’ll kill everyone.
Show them a gun and you better be prepared to pull that trigger the moment they see it, because you’re going to die.
In a tense situation where there’s been some minor violence, a gun will immediately escalate things to a lethal level.
Stick to what I said and don’t make up stuff in your head please. I’m not against forceful opposition - rocks fly, things catch on fire, barricades get erected.
But don’t give them an armed conflict where they will 100% win, and much more easily spin it to fit their agenda.
That’s exactly what the Hamas attacks did - those fucking morons opened the door and put down a red carpet for Israel to get away with launching a full out “justified” war.
Open carry would have stopped NOTHING.
Flashing a gun at those GI Joe wannabes would have triggered their tiny brains to go into shoot to kill mode, and it would have been a massacre.
These dimwits are trained for full blown military responses. That’s easy for them, they have the gear, the training, and the psychopaths to shoot on sight.
What they can’t handle is massive civil disobedience, because they can’t arrest 100k, 500k, 1 million people who are out there lawfully protesting.
But it’s nutjobs like you, or that moron who sped their car at the agents, who will fuck it up for everyone.
Don’t bring your gun. Keep it at home, and if shit gets to the point where they start killing people, then defend yourself.
You know what cracks me up? That there’s a rather high likelihood that I know more about mRNA that you do. Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
If you are aware of a specific mechanism that this kind of treatment can go poorly
Alright, so here’s one a concern.
As you’re certainly aware, there are studies that have found that viral RNA can carry into the host’s nucleus and be reverse-transcribed into the infected cell’s genome (for your convenience, here’s one such finding for SARS-CoV-2 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105968118), and that it produces chimeric transcripts that fuse the viral and host sequences.
Can you address how an mRNA vaccine would be able to ensure that such reverse transcription would not occur?
Here’s another concern.
The Pfizer BNT162b2 COVID vaccine is, of course, a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) mRNA vaccine, which is basically the approach discussed in the OP article. This article (Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(3), 1115-1126) found that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure. Not only that, it has also found increased nuclear expression and distribution of LINE-1, an endogenous reverse transcriptase.
Since we previously covered the integration of foreign RNA into the host’s DNA, can you please explain how do you propose to identify and control for possible epigenetic effects of mRNA vaccines?
Seems like people found my zombie apocalypse parallel a bit too farfetched, but cancerous growth and tumors are in essence breakdowns of the genetic machinary in our cells, which mRNA vaccines are just too happy to mess with. All I’m advocating is more research, better understanding, and safety.
the researchers have shown for the first time that mRNA can be delivered into the cells where HIV is hiding, by encasing it in a tiny, specially formulated fat bubble. The mRNA then instructs the cells to reveal the virus.
Am I the only one kinda scared about mRNA treatments?
I have always wondered how a zombie apocalypse could come about, like, from a biochemical perspective, and mRNA seems to me a very good candidate.
Obviously it has a massive potential to cure otherwise incurable diseases, like genetic defects…
Edit: Sheesh thanks for the downvotes, teaches me to ask a question on Lemmy.
You’re not very good at this…