It wouldn’t be impossible that 12 is an improvement. 10 was an improvement on 8. I think, as always, it’ll never go back to a truely good OS, we will just get used to the crap bits.
I think windows is too entrenched in it’s own version history to make good again. You’d need to start from scratch which simply won’t happen within the windows brand.
10 was already deep into hiding settings and fragmenting the control panel.
11 is much worse.
Because touch screens are cheap and put the onus of design onto the programmers of apps.
It matters because you can get used games for sometimes a tenth of the price they charge on the digital store.
New tab tools.
You can even do a trick to make it your home tab
I plan to live forever or die trying
I get it.
The actual offer is: “Starlink users will get free internet” but it’s been put forward as: “everyone gets free Starlink”
It’s the equivalent of corporations changing their Facebook profile picture to a rainbow. It basically costs then nothing, especially if affected areas have no electricity.
You agree to the licence terms when you purchase the software. If you disagree, don’t buy it.
Do you have a link to a track ball mouse as an example of what you mean? What do you think are the pros and cons of using one?
What is this based on? It sounds like something that would be against even the most basic licence terms.
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I’m asking about whether the concept of “you are allowed to play pirated games if you own a physical copy of it” is based on any legal truth.
I’m aware that the emulators are largely completely legal as long as they don’t package console bios’ with it. That’s why you have to go find a pirate bios to make your emulator run
The sequel Fade to Black was too clunky to enjoy. I never played the remake but I hear the remake is getting a sequel, so I might pick it up.
My favourite was Flashback. Kind of the spiritual sequel to Another World. I had the SNES version. I think it’s my all time favourite video game.
Do you have anything to back that up? Or is it just “trust me bro” that kind of proves my point?
Did that claim have any actual grounding in reality? Or is it just an urban legend that keeps persisting?
It wasn’t the tank controls per se. It was the tile based actions. Tomb Raider was basically a 3D Prince of Persia game. If you’re running and you press the jump button, the character would jump the next time to got to the edge of the current tile. It was a very deliberate and measured way to plan your moves.
They did that with Tomb Raider, but ironically the obtuse controls were pivotal to the game design.
They aren’t testing anything. They are just enacting a stealth twilight of old Reddit like they’ve been planning ever since they thought up the new UI.
The ones that pay are the ones running the ads. If the content creators have to pay, they will be the ones doing ads. This is how AV content has worked since the dawn of broadcast radio.
If you start with the second one you won’t know what’s going on and feel like you’ve missed a bunch of important story.
This is how it felt after playing the first one as well. Half Life 2 is almost an unrelated game. The plots of the two barely line up.