Has legality or bad PR stopped Microsoft in the past? Worst case they pay a fine and everyone continues to use Windows anyways. The only reason Microsoft hasn’t done this already is because they haven’t figured out a way to profit from it yet.

Basically all of Valves business relies on Windows. Valve saw how Apple operates MacOS and iOS, then saw Microsoft release the Windows Store and put two and two together lol.

I think the whole point of Steam OS is to cut down reliance on Microsoft. If Microsoft really wanted to the could cut support to Steam all together.

Go to sleep, futures bleak bro!

Homer Simpson can afford a 4 bedroom house with a two car garage, 3 kids, a stay at home wife, a dog and a cat from a single white collor job. And they depict this outcome as if he’s sacrificing something or as a punishment.

He’s literally living most millennials dream, that’s how much they stole from us.

I have no idea what you’re talking about, it’s always meant that. Anyone who doesn’t follow the teachings of Jesus but calls themselves Christian is just lying.

Being Conservative and being Christian aren’t compatible ideologies. You can follow the teachings of Jesus or be conservative, you can’t do both.

Minor Internet Influencer uses minor internet influence to raise funds for campaign.

No mention of her parents was made in the article linked.

This is while he was Vice President, who are not allowed to drive while serving plus six months after their service as vice president has ended per video linked.

1. He will if he can get a gold bar out of it.

2. If Menendez does him a favor or kisses his ass on TV.

3. Menendezs son, who is in Congress does him a favor.

Look what happened to Snoop Dogg after Trump pardoned his friend.

I agree.

When was GN proven wrong and did they at least admit they where wrong? Everybody gets things wrong, it’s how often you’re wrong and how you handle being wrong that matters.

Not being held legally liable ≠ Nothing happened

Afaik the report that was done was not made public. If one side paid for the investigation and controls all the info in said investigation then it can’t be used as proof of innocence.

The firm also has its own reputation to consider, and wouldn’t let a client get away with materially misrepresenting their results.

Meaning what? What would the company doing the investigation do is if the claims that someone said:

I was asked about my sexual history, my boyfriends sexual history, “how I liked to fuck”.

I was asked to twerk for a co-worker at one point.

I was told I was chunky, fat, ugly, stupid. I was called “retarded” I was called a "removed

Where true? How would one even prove that actually happened to them? The Investigation Company surely signed an NDA and had no legal ability to release any info found in says investigation right? If they started releasing info that accusations where in fact true they would lose all their business immediately right?

https://lemmy.zip/comment/13100245

Here’s a quick roundup of some, but not all of the issues people have with LTT.

A former LTT employee made claims of sexual harassment and poor working environment. LTT paid a third party to investigate those claims and unsurprisingly didn’t find evidence that supported those claims. A lot of LTT stans use this as “evidence” that the accuser was lying. Assuming that is clearly false logic, investigating yourself isn’t proof of innocence.

FYI, userbenchmark not exactly the most unbiased or honest website to reference.

And failed casino. Another cash grab for sure.

Is this from that same Atari with the shady cryptocurrency and overpriced console?

I meant Linus, not Linux. Sorry for the confusion (>ლ)

LMFAO, thank you for catching that. Definitely a typo, now fixed.

I didn’t watch the video so couldn’t say on that point. But, Linus isn’t very liked by many in the tech community for multiple reasons and many of the down votes are surely due to this.