Spam.
AI generated site that re-hosts an existing game.
Example of clearly AI drivel, the instruction for the player to “explain your answer”
Spam.
AI generated site that re-hosts an existing game.
Example of clearly AI drivel, the instruction for the player to “explain your answer”
Spot on.
Rough summary of when it is energy and effort efficient: https://xkcd.com/1924/
Shadowbans are sitewide and almost always automates actions to counter spam.
Your chances are better if you avoid doing “spam-like” things:
If you are unlucky and caught in a false positive, there is an /appeals form that is usually helpful.
No stupid questions.
No. Stupid questions.
No stupid! Questions!
No, stupid. Questions.
No! Stupid! Questions?
No shoes, no shirt, no stupid questions.
No stupid questions beyond this point.
There are no stupid questions.
We ain’t judging no stupid questions.
Thanks! Annoying behavior of web client. If it wasn’t stored as a link, it shouldn’t render it as one.
It does in the web version. :/ Which client are you using?
Statues (game) has been around since the eighties at least, and was one of the inspirations for the weeping angels.
Also, cats https://youtu.be/NbwpgyRUv5g
Appreciate your thoughts and responses!
Though we disagree on the effectiveness, I am all in favour of what you are pushing towards.
It’s so funny to be reminded of that period in the 90s where any first person game was described as a “DOOM clone”, because DOOM itself was the first FPS that hugely took off.
Without additional context, no. One has a word extra.
It says nothing, so you have copyright on it.
Adding a restrictive license to it only means as much as you’re willing and able to police it yourself and take others to court and argue that they can not assume the same freedom of use of your comments that they can with the rest of the site.
As an individual, for comments of two sentences each, this is not an option.
As far as I can tell, they don’t prohibit it. Couldn’t find any mention of it in Lemmy.world TOS
If they even notice it, they will say that the website TOS is the relevant license.
Eirher way, they will just go ahead and use it. None of us have the resources or perseverance to prove anything and take them to court in a meaningful way.
Assume I’m a psychopath C-level executive. Why would I spend huge resources on a success that earns money when I can earn money on fifty screwups instead?
Like other comments have said: Cooked and quickly refridgerated is always good for a week. In addition to that, using portion size containers for the food makes it easier to eat. Especially handy for food you freeze.
They suck at flying in a light breeze, so putting a fan on your porch or balcony does help to make it tolerable to sit there.
Whether the culture is good or bad is not strongly indicated by the size. You’ll get a good feel by meeting them. Prepare some questions on turnover and overtime use. You want both low.
You will have to do work that in a bigger company would be specialist work. Some possible examples: Maintain infrastructure, drag network cables, purchase your computer, negotiate with service providers, software architecture, UX, product strategy, frontend, backend, integrations, customer support, QA, fix the printer, argue with the landlord about ventilation, etc. All this could be heaven or hell based on your personality. :)
Whichever revelation you’ve had that you are dying to “teach” everyone, it’s easier if you just state it directly.
I guarantee you it’s not as reality-shattering as you think it is. Whatever it is, we have seen or thought it and multiple variations of it before.
Let it out, maybe you get some interesting insights to learn from instead of this. It’s just silly.
Software developer here. I only apply for onsite jobs if I believe I will be able to formally or informally switch to hybrid once I build some trust.