I don’t think you’re understanding my point. If, as you said, you have to assign a delegate “case by case” for every vote, then you have to vote in every vote. This comes with all the problems of getting people to vote on things now, but 100x as bad because of how many votes there would be.
Thats the joke
Then the delegator has to vote/delegate on every issue-- they don’t need expertise themselves like in a direct democracy, but it is still an issue due to sheer vote volume.
Haven’t seen this posted in a while. I forgot you can delegate your vote to different people for different issues. How is the “category” of an issue decided though?
Undertale also has really bad code and it’s a great game
With what flour? :/
Has anyone figuted out how long it will take for this to affect our food supply? Surely at least prices will increase, if not outright shortages happen?
Maybe the image is of an arched ibex?
Words have meaning if you have the capability to read
Please read the rest of the comment
Your points don’t get better just because you coined/found a new term
There’s really no excuse for this
You speak on matters which you do not understand
Her name was Susan or did she not change it?
Dweezil is an amazing name
I made both claims actually. So despite the authors of the document working in Trump’s highest advisory roles, you think that it’s not the plan? Ok, what is his plan then? Because he seems to be following P25 fairly well for something that’s supposedly not his plan.
Life must be so easy when you can just call anything you don’t like bias. I made a specific claim: Six of Trump’s cabinet secretaries authored or contributed to Project 2025. This is easily verifiable with any source you want to use. But it’s easier to just ignore that, huh?
BREAKING: Water wet