Ooooh boy, that’s a nice one, almost got me!

I’m not sure that it can be clearly delineated as a time loop or a causality loop, it’s honestly a mix of both - though you’d probably call it a causality loop, as each “instance of a person” only experiences the loop once.

Well yes, you didn’t get first ads. But what about second ads?

What about stories about time travel that ultimately form a closed loop? There’s one that has people moving forwards and backwards through time, yet forms a closed loop at the end: >!Dark!<

I’m aware, it was mostly a joke about these “features” making Notepad worse. Nevertheless, thank you :)

More like Notepad–, amirite

Let’s go with the Cambridge definition:

a perfect society in which people work well with each other and are happy

The Oxford Languages definition is incomplete enough to not be a valid counter argument - “perfect” doesn’t mean everyone 100% gets what they want. The only sensible interpretation is “perfect” from a societal perspective.

But if yes, then as long as current conditions meet anyone’s definition of utopia, then we’re all living in one.

No, Utopia has a defined set of meanings. If current conditions meet someone’s definition of Utopia, but doesn’t meet the defined set of meanings, it doesn’t mean current conditions are Utopia.

“Utopia” doesn’t mean everyone gets what they want. People can want things to be worse while still living in a Utopia.

Try finger but dog.

How have I never heard of “gayety”

Society

Man, Ego got old…

You mean John Evangelion?

Rip and tear, until it is done. And you can start knitting again.

chuckles in immutable distribution

Well, more like “left wing groups being destroyed by greedy capitalists”

Nice code, good job!

YOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Looks great, I can’t wait!

Also, the man doesn’t know how to do effective allegories.

“Look, the robots all have to stand in the back of the bus and are treated badly! Really makes you think, hm?”