I think it makes more sense to read that it’s a “Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (applications/programs)”.
I think it makes more sense to read that it’s a “Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (applications/programs)”.
Generally, yeah. The way they worked with Mick Gordon last game was awful though.
He’s probably talking about the article released by Mozilla a few weeks ago.
But basically all car manufacturers have absolutely terrible privacy policies.
Yes, but it only works with the original client. Doesn’t appear to work with OpenMW, yet, which is superior in many ways now.
Are power lines ever really insulated though? I’m Midwest US and have only seen them insulated when running from the poles to houses. Have never seen them insulated anywhere else.
I like to send the HTML, CSS, and JS to my laser printer personally.
I’m one that finds the GNU/Linux naming annoying. I think calling it that is mostly silly, and am mostly annoyed at people who militantly argue it’s the only way to describe a Linux OS (which aren’t as common as they used to be).
To me, it’s just overly verbose and pointless. For the most part, the GNU part has been implied for pretty much any mainstream form of Linux for decades. And even if it wasn’t, who cares? Like, you wouldn’t say that you run KDE/X11/wpasupplicant/neovim/docker/pacman/paru/systemd/GNU/Linux… Just saying KDE on Arch Linux is simpler and far more informative.