Right? I mean, why would someone who shot their spouse do anything irrational?
Right? I mean, why would someone who shot their spouse do anything irrational?
Let’s take a look at the old ssd…
C:\Program Files (x86)\Epic Games
C:\Program Files (x86)\GOG Galaxy
C:\Program Files (x86)\Hearthstone
C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\
etcetera
owns 47 guns, 26,000 rounds -> shoots wife
Never woulda seen that coming! Must be the booze!
In C:\Program Files? Or C:\Program Files (x86)?
you wouldn’t call yourself a chef, or serve it to anyone who expected “gourmet shit”.
Hell yes I would!
As someone who didn’t have disposable income until I was in my thirties, I had a lot of catching up to do and the people there helped me out a lot.
Might be right but in my experience a lack of skill in conversing with AI is a much greater factor in determining it’s usefulness. It’s almost always going to defer to the user. It’s like when someone is dealing with tech support and they tell them to try turning it off and on again. If that really is the solution, and the user insists that it is not, CGPT is going to make something up just to appease the user’s request.
Users have to know that CGPT isn’t magic. How they behave affects how it behaves. Kind of like talking to actual people, which is what it’s essentially trying to simulate.
Perfect example of a blatantly intellectualy dishonest argument right here. Show me how Pokemon cards were designed to burn down a house.