Depends on if we consider Zuccer a person.
Depends on if we consider Zuccer a person.
These “ai says” articles are all fluff. You can get an LLM to say just about anything you want. This is akin to “my child says we should eat the neighbor.”
Seed boxes are inherently handling replaceable data, bar unpopular torrents. This is such a silly comparison.
We’ll still be hulks, it just won’t be that incredible.
You can have the most secure and secret OS in existence, and you’re failing miserably the moment it has unfettered access to the internet.
On the flip side, literally any OS can be secure if it’s airgapped in a sealed room.
There’s a happy medium in there, and that’s where most governments want to be.
Ah okay, just found it curious. Thanks for lettin me know!
Somewhat niche a use case, but *extremely interesting. Hopefully it can be adapted for other conditions!
A bot edited its comment? O.o
Then the social left started pushing things that it wanted purely because of morals
Example?
Bots are indeed a problem, but at the same time so are the huge swaths of users dedicated to a single users whim. When one person with enough pulls says “I want to take over this entire area of the canvas” and it happens in minutes?… it ruins the experience. Bots are just a way for this to happen without the following.
The only issue this would truly cause in the long run is a bit of admin work. There are and were plenty of scabs willing to take over unmoderated subs. Sure, the quality of those subs would have suffered, but Reddit never cared about that beyond what essentially boiled down to “don’t let “bad” content stay up.” Beyond that, mods could do whatever they wanted for the most part.
Very odd. I’d have thought they were gonna go for one take as much as possible, but I guess not.
Did we see anything? They are offline whenever I check but it seems they were live about 20m ago?
Not in the slightest.
Might want to edit your title to specify “room temperature superconducting.”
I get where you’re coming from, but keep in mind that at the time this happened, there were 2 people working on the code, and likely only a handful paying.
TRMM was originally a personal project, at the beginning of which it makes some sense to intermingle things on the “official” site. I know I’ve done similar, but my projects never take off to the point that people are doing an audit. And I know I would absolutely make that exact exe for personal use.
Keep in mind, the only reason the version with a crypto miner was found was because someone went digging around. No one was ever linked to the installer, no one had ever downloaded it by mistake, no one had ever had it stealthily installed without consent.
I get that it’s a scary concept, like when brave was found to be injecting affiliate links into normal traffic. But in this case it wasn’t even something put in prod. It was found by accident, in a place that wasn’t doing any harm, and was never found in the wild.
Seems like a lot to get worked up over.
As for the discord chat, I’m not surprised. Having been in their discord for about as long as that “scandal” has been around: The reason his responses were fumbling? He’s just a hobbyist that’s managed to get one of his projects into a good enough place to make money off of. Are you expecting a PR team level of response?
He changed it back already.
Not failing, but actively ignoring Metas own research that shows Facebook is directly harmful to children and teens.
I’d say actively continuing to harm children should outrank being a jackass and/or incompetence.