KillingTimeItself

ok have fun bozo

holy shit i cant believe you linked something written in the 70s for this.

so true bestie, so true

oopsies typo. I said state because i was actively talking about states in another conversation, happened to commit a freudian slip.

My life is now ruined.

Uhh… you passed by comments with that info to get here dude… again, are you mentally handicapped or something? Because that’s about the only thing that could explain how fucking stupid you are.

homie you did the same shit to me, just about other countries instead.

google the definition of car lmao.

trucks are also a car?

That car is still probably is at least twice the weight of the kei truck. It’s arguably probably not crashing in the correct spot for the crumple zone of the impacting car to work appropriately, and if it is it still weighs significantly more than the kei truck meaning it’s significantly less effective.

Perhaps go and find some parameters from this “supposed” test, and post them here so we can oggle at them.

all those other countries haven’t had an increase in pedestrian rates… and you’ve provided nothing to support this claim…

and i don’t have to as i don’t live in those other states.

You haven’t provided me with any info as to why they haven’t risen in other places, but have risen in the US so arguably, you’re just factually incorrect by fallacy of logical reasoning!

Fucking yeesh, you’re about the stupidest one in this chain trying to argue lmfao.

no, because they’re the supreme court, and they’re appointed for life.

it’s only contempt, from my understanding of law it’s not uncommon for contempt of court, and inter court violations to be anywhere from like 2 weeks of jail time, to a few months.

since people are yelling about it.

It’s probably not blatantly bypassing security and privacy features, what it is PROBABLY doing is using the user to bypass them by simply manipulating them to do it.

Social engineering is way easier than whatever bullshit you would need to do to bypass sandboxing and dynamically recompile, or whatever people are claiming, and my guess would be that this is what they’re doing.

If the suit is claiming they are doing what i said, that’s probably legal, and not going anywhere, unless tiktok ban bill 2.0. If the suit is claiming what others are claiming, it’s still probably wrong and probably going to be tiktok ban bill 2.0.

Unfortunately these things aren’t all that exciting at the end of the day.

one of the most obvious ways is to simply not bypass them, and then do it from within the application itself. That way you can essentially man in the middle the rest of it, though this would require a rather specific set of events and a particularly nested design of an app.

if true this is huge.

Tax actually gaming a little hard

that would be why the /s goes at the end :)

go have a look at my other comment in your inbox :)

i almost mentioned australia, but australia is just now getting an influx of these trucks, they’re becoming more popular.

Mexico, well uh, mexico has cartels, so i feel like that’s completely redundant and not worth mentioning, the statistics you could even gather from mexico are probably more significantly swayed by the existence of the cartels than they are from the increase in danger of the truck tbh.

Mexico is also a completely different place, so i would have to research into mexico specifically to know more about it and how it would be a problem.

unfortunately for you i live in america and do go outside, so i have a rather reliable viewpoint there. And that’s what im talking about.

as for canada, canada has a lot of logging and oil industry so it’s probably related to that, most of the populated parts of canada are coast line, the norther border and farther north are generally sparse and has a considerably lower population than most of the US. It’s just a little bit different from the US in most regards that would make comparing the data directly much harder.

Seems like you might have more ignorance than me, considering you forgot the entire rest of the world, where as you literally just referenced the entirety of “north america” maybe you’re just american pilled, but north america is not global, it’s north america.

probably a combination of the fact that there are substantially more trucks in the US compared to places in the EU for example where the statistics are probably significantly closer to “margin of error” levels of accuracy.

The US also has substantially more people driving, substantially more road, substantially less skilled drivers one could argue, though i would argue we have a much wider range of skilled drivers, than somewhere like germany for example, where they have a might tighter though higher sitting range of skilled drivers.

edit: a lot of these trucks outside the US are likely to be work vehicles exclusively i imagine, where as in the US they’re primarily work and personal, though i sure do see a lot more personal trucks on the road than i do work trucks on the road.

In short, other places don’t have these issues because other places simply have a lot less vehicles, and a lot less traffic, as well as a lot less of these trucks per capita compared to the US which is just statistically what you expect to see in the results.

Dangerous vehicles are really only dangerous when in large numbers because otherwise they are quite literally a statistical anomaly. It’s why old vehicles are still allowed on the road in the US even though they’re less safe, there just isn’t enough of them for it to be statistically significant.

3/5s car law when btw

oopsie daisies, how could i accidentally commit a racism! Silly me, it just freudian slips sometimes!

the reason they mention the US is because the US has significantly more of these trucks, it’s not even shifting goalposts, it’s literally cherrypicking the data to make it look better than it is.