You have written tests for your code and now feel safe because your code is tested. But test quality is really hard to measure. The idea seems to be to introduce “vulnerabilities” (whatever that means…) and see if your tests catch them. If they do that’s supposed to show that the tests are good and vice versa.

As the first AI-based mutation testing tool, Mutahunter surpasses traditional “dumb” AST-based methods. Our AI-driven approach provides a full contextual understanding of the entire codebase,

This is where I call bullshit. The AST is a precise representation of the code which should be easier to analyse and modify instead of the raw text. If you only rely on processing the text I have a hard time believing your AI has a deep understanding of the contextual interdependencies of the different parts of the code.

Edit: it kinda does use the AST if one of the preconditions is a treesitter grammar? Maybe the marketing wording is just very unfortunate?

Stupidity shouldn’t result in death. And not following the law also shouldn’t result in death as long as lives aren’t actively endangered.

Aside from that, chasing the guy over a broken light was pretty dumb of the cop. Noncooperative vehicles are a BIG hazard to other traffic. Write down the number plate, visit them at home. The taillight will still be broken tomorrow.

Well ackshually, any such system with a defined maximum precision can be represented by an integer unit that is small enough, the numbers will just get very big.

I’m playing “curse of the dead gods” right now. I wanted to scratch that hades itch while hades 2 is cooking. Pretty good, different, more random approach to the weapons system.

and a very invasive mechanic around lighting the rooms with a torch and immobile fireplaces. By default you get hit harder in the dark but there are also modifiers to give you benefits in the dark to change up the tradeoffs

I’m not sure I like it as much as Hades it’s a bit clunky but I’d recommend getting it in a sale for sure

Well ackshually real-time describes a mode of processing data where you have hard requirements on when a computation needs to be finished.

Huh that might actually be an issue with your client, mine renders those as two dots

Hm it seems I misread the documentation there. I know why it doesn’t resolve the “…” and that’s fine, it just seemed very unnecessary in combination with my flawed understanding of the relative path handling.

Edit: and just to be snarky: I didn’t type “…” I typed “…”. ;)

I’m not really sure I get the usefulness of this absolute function. It still returns relative paths if the input was relative and it doesn’t resolve “…”. What would you use it for where canonicalize doesn’t work for you?

That’s quite besides my point but I’ll answer in two ways:

Firstly what defines “working” isn’t really your choice. If the goal is to have fun the silliest stuff can be called “working”. If the goal is to escape reality for a bit then pretending to be a mermaid might be quite effective.

Secondly, my point was just that there is a game, played by people that are probably enjoying themselves, which could probably be translated into a Video game. Just like any other sports.

Afaik there are people actually playing quidditch, brooms and all. So there must be something playable there

You think a company run by Elon has an extensive software safety review system?

I loathe tiktok but if someone had banned Reddit while I was still using it I would have been hella mad. On the other hand it would have been “How will I manage without unhinged shitposts mixed with ads” from the outside

Yeah they messed up once. It’s still miles better than just not having someone looking at the included stuff

Debian actually started to collect and maintain packages of the most important rust crates. You can use that as a source for cargo

Yeah he did some mediocre horror but then he sadly drifted off into some niche nerd movies

Yeah I don’t think this is a big-ish problem currently. But by having this vulnerability to point to, other CPU vendors have a good reason not to include this feature in their own chips.

There are definitely bullshit cves out there but I don’t think that’s a good general rule. Especially in this context where it’s literally unpatchable at the root of the problem.

So the attack is (very basically, if I understand correctly)

Setup:

• I control at least one process on the machine I am targeting another process on
• I can send data to the target process and the process will decrypt that

Attack:

• I send data that in some intermediate state of decryption will look like a pointer
• This “pointer” contains some information about the secret key I am trying to steal
• The prefetcher does it’s thing loading the data “pointed to” in the cache
• I can observe via a cache side channel what the prefetcher did, giving me this “pointer” containing information about the secret key
• Repeat until I have gathered enough information about the secret key

Is this somewhat correct? Those speculative execution vulnerabilities always make my brain hurt a little

Most pixeled Shit I’ve ever seen