Police rules of engagement is shockingly 0, cops kill anyone for any reason if they perceive even the slightest chance of a threat to themselves. The military has a rigorous 5-6 steps for using increasing amounts of violence from shouting to actually firing.
It’s very easy to just tell them to get a hotel and they’ll be reimbursed or just bulk order all the rooms in a couple hotels. The national guard troops along the border in their pretend mission do that, they all just stay at a hotel.
Yeah. I dunno why nobody else brought up the correct answer.
Gay rights, they’re a religious group that is just as intolerant as the Saudis or Pakistan.
Yeah, the conde owner bit isn’t news to anyone, just cause this one guy never looked. Are is fine and it will be as long as the current people are there. Until it gets looted and the staff laid off it is fine. Eric Berger navigates a bit of a tightrope because he has high level access to Musk but can’t be too direct about asking anything other than rockets, even though the political part is affecting the space part a lot right now. I do expect that just like Polygon it will eventually be gutted but nothing lasts forever.
A lot of them for the small articles and stubs are written very technically and don’t provide an explanation for complex subjects if you aren’t already familiar with it. Then you have to read 4 subjects down just to figure out the jargon for what they’re saying
There’s no good reason to need a high powered semiautomatic rifle, anything you need can be done with a bolt action rifle.
If you read the article, it says this only applies to people that already have premium google office stuff already. The 90% of people with regular gmail accounts aren’t affected by this. For now at least.
You can poll anything, you just need money to run a poll and people to answer.
That doesn’t address why you would immediately try to use chatgpt to change a joke.
That’s not how comparisons work
Yeah, but then you have something like when people protest deleted their history on reddit which is fine as a protest tactic but leaves a hole where your specific question came up but now there’s nothing there.
There are a lot of videos of the frame cracking from mild outdoor use, which instantly totals the whole vehicle.
The batteries are still expensive and good to use for anything else. So it should be 20-25k in scrap.
Demand will decrease at a gradual and then rapid pace while there will be plenty of production even with decreased levels of oil exploration. I didn’t say none, only that supply will exceed demand.
That’s also incorrect. Oil is effectively unlimited, in the sense that we will stop using it on a large scale within the next 2-3 decades and after that demand will be lower than supply, the same situation we have with coal now.
And farmland is not plentiful at all, even though most of the world is covered in farmland it is always in short supply. That’s why Brazil farmers cut down and burn rainforest for farmland to feed cattle, or cut down orangutan habitat to grow palm oil. There is a 1:1 relationship between farmland and habitat for animals.
That’s incorrect, making things from crops that use farms which could be wildlife habitat and use oil based fertilizers and pesticides isn’t necessarily better or emit less net co2. It may in some cases be better but just like corn based ethanol it can also increase food shortages and depending on where it’s grown be worse than just using oil.
Ok. I’m not sure what that raw data looks like, how easy it is to see the specifics.
Yeah, but people can see if you downvote your own comment, right?
How many people have even heard of peertube?