That’s where I am too. That’s why I’m confused. The Articles of Confederation failed horribly.

If they ignore election results then they’re illegitimate and the country is free to descend into chaos.

Great. Don’t engage then. But somewhere between 30 and 50 percent of Americans use the app. It’s fate is national news.

No, but they always claimed it was.

He’s an idiot.

Well they have to hire someone if they want to make money. If they throw us into a food crisis because we won’t let them abuse people then we’ll just nationalize the fields.

We should institute an agriculture work visa that includes a Spanish language lesson on their rights and go after the corporations that make them work in the fields while pesticide is being sprayed.

They’ve tried. They can’t abuse American workers the way they do immigrant workers.

It is though?

And then he instead advocates that senators should be moved into the House of Representatives. The House thinks it’s great. So they never start an impeachment.

Except most of the Anti Federalists weren’t arguing against the specifics of the model, they were arguing against a centralized government at all. Which had literally just failed.

To be fair, that’s a piece of paper. If the President violates that and isn’t impeached then there’s nothing physical to stop him.

Impeachment. That’s it.

But you’re also forgetting that in the US states have a significant amount of power. For example the President cannot cancel elections. If a state cancels elections they just don’t get counted.

There’s a lot in that particular area that shields people from federal government stupidity.

Unless they completely throw out the Constitution they still have to let the states run elections. And the States generally aren’t interested in rigging their elections.

You’re forgetting Arizona and California. Arizona’s Blue Wave is particularly left leaning too…

Some of the state parties have considerably more teeth.

All we have to do is ask what happens to a “migrant” baby left at a fire house.

Straight to the state care system?

Oh wow.

Signal

Even that’s a limited form of jurisdiction. Managed by treaty, the same level as the Constitution.

The payload

Among the categories of individuals born in the United States and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, the privilege of United States citizenship does not automatically extend to persons born in the United States:

(1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or

(2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States at the time of said person’s birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa) and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.

Which is absolutely ridiculous. In the first case if they aren’t subject to your jurisdiction then you cannot deport them. And in the second they would not need a visa. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t make them subject to our laws without them being subject to the United State’s Jurisdiction.