Or it shouldn’t be a fine, but criminal prosecution for the executives responsible.

The only worse choice for CEO is Chambers. She had a valid reason to just fire his ass. If he’s not willing to do what he’s told to do, then he’s not willing to do his job. It looks to me like the board wanted to get rid of him for reasons that had nothing to do with cancer. Why reference the cancer at all?

I have the feeling the only reason they didn’t just get rid of him was because of the cancer diagnosis. Trying to be “nice”. But even if the cancer was the reason for not just cutting him loose, there’s no reason to bring it up.

How does the CEO not know referencing the cancer would expose them to liability? Did they not sit down with their lawyers before sitting down with him?

Now they’re probably going to lose in court and be forced to pay him off.

They should fire Chambers.

Serious question: are there other constitutional rights that can provide the direct means to kill?

I’m just going to drop this here:

https://whywontgodhealamputees.com/

Did she actually throw shit on him?

If she did, a punch seems like a not unreasonable reaction to me.

it has pedals like a bicycle

Are you taking about the Aptera from the video you linked?

If so, the Aptera doesn’t have pedals like a bicycle. It’s a fully electric vehicle (or it will be if it reaches production).

If you are female and have to take time off for a medical procedure, they’ll just assume it’s an abortion and flunk you. After all, why are you in school anyway? You don’t need an education to clean house and have babies.

How?

The nice thing about Linux is, he can’t buy it and fuck it up.

No no, you’re wrong. The problem is taxes are too high and the people on the absolute top don’t get enough money. If we just make them a bit richer, the wealth will finally start trickling down on us.

Wait! I think I feel it trickling down right now!

Nope. Just piss. Again.

Conservative humor: trip a child and laugh when it is injured.

If 9 year old girls could hold an aspirin between their legs, they wouldn’t get pregnant. They are sluts so naturally they should give birth because that will make it better.

This is the craziest thing to me. Babies as punishment for “moral failing.”

A baby is not and should never be a punishment. Anyone who thinks a baby is a punishment shouldn’t be having babies or forcing others to have babies.

We gave our son children’s Benadryl to get him to sleep, but:

He was five.

He couldn’t sleep because he broke his arm earlier that day and we had to wait until the next day to get a cast on it (so the swelling would go down). He just had a splint, so every time he moved, it hurt.

When we called the ER to ask what to do so he could sleep, they said anything they would do would require him to be admitted, so the best solution was to just give him a dose of children’s Benadryl.

He was our kid, not someone else’s kid entrusted to our care with the understanding that we wouldn’t drug him.

That’s ridiculous. He was executed for being black. The counterfeit bill was just the excuse.

Yeah, but if the hated turns into a complete rejection of everything he stands for, there’s a chance.

There’s a chance that Melania has instilled in him a deep and neverending hatred of his father. It shouldn’t have been too difficult. In an effort to rebel against everything his father represents, he might accidentally become a good person.

You mean The Gangster of Love?

Fucking racists think if you’re anti-racist, you’re anti-white.

… state judges won’t finalize divorces during a pregnancy. Established in the 1970s, the rule was intended to make sure men were financially accountable for the children they fathered.

So, I’m assuming if you knock someone up in Missouri without being married, you don’t have to pay child support?

Are judges in Missouri just too damn stupid to include conceived but as yet unborn children in any child support requirements?

Or perhaps, it’s just about making sure men can continue to abuse their own “property”?

Welcome to humanity