It’s still not what the initiative is asking for (in the EU)

Typo

While I agree with the sentiment: It won’t be killed, “just” de-listed from sale. If you buy it now, you can still p/ay it.

Although an end-of-life plan would probably make it easier for the publishers to still sell the game after licences expire.

I think I prefer the convenience and (hopefully) security from a dedicated streaming service.

Hmm, never thought to do it that way. Maybe I’m a bit too attached to the classical “official album release” stuff.

That’s what I meant uith “subsonic”, lol. Doesn’t this have the same catalogueing problem as jellyfin?

Jellyfin catalogues songs on albums by artists. DJ sets are a different category of music track.

Don’t know that one. Seems like a good lead. Thanks for showing me the way in the rabbit hole. ;)

No gyro support? ;_;

Enshittification engaged. /j

Exactly. This is a bet that Plex is going to lose with the proliferation of Jellyfin.

I am in this picture and I don’t like it.

This is me on my first PC that I built myself… and Windows XP lacked the S-ATA drivers. Suse worked fine, tho.

The zines from the nerds of the 00’s.

This is the n-th cartoon of this bland style.

• The redundant shirt and speech bubble
• the lack of a proper punchline
• weird smile on the right dude
• fingers

I think the difficulty curve of Johto in G/S is quite relaxed until you get to do the rest of the gyms. Maybe that’s why emerald feels like such a slog.

Wake up, Neo

Here’s the wikipedia definition

Plagiarism is the representation of another person’s language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one’s own original work.

So, I’m afraid that my definition is closer to consensus than yours.

If word gets out that you used a ghostwriter, you’re gonna get in trouble for plagiarism. That’s the thing they’ll accuse you of.

While consent is a part of why plagiarism is shitty, it’s not what makes something plagiarism. You can check it the other way around: if I’m legitimately quoting someone, do I need explicit consent, or is it implied (if it’s published work)?

About the BSD stuff: yeah, it might not be illegal and consential, but both of these things aren’t necessary for plagiarism.

What are you talking about? I’ve given you several examples of plagiarism outside of a legal concept, which means that there are non-legalistic definitions.

Here’s another one: copying someone’s homework is plagiarism. It’s not illegal, though.

I’d argue that most acts of plagiarism are actually legal, but can result in getting your title revoked. That’s not because of an IP law violation, since you don’t have ownership of an argument in an academic text.

Letting a ghostwriter write an academic paper is plagiarism, too, btw. How would that make sense in an IP law context, if the ghost writer not obtaining the IP is the whole point?

I think your legalistic view of the world is quite limiting.

It’s not illegal to rephrase what someone wrote in a book and pass it off as your own work. You can’t “own” a cultural analysis. It’s still plagiarism.

There’s more than a legal definition of plagiarism.

Plagiarism is when you sell the work of others as your own without attribution. There are bucketloads of examples of legal plagiarism.

I’m pretty sure that everything H. Bomberguy discussed in his plagiarism video was legal, for example.