Many ways away from fossil fuel, both solar and nuclear would have been great options, but even with early solar, we would have had to use coal or gass for base load without nuclear was what u was trying to say.

How we let them was just by not standing up and not holding them accountable. That is still the issue today. They knew for DECADES and still is profiting with government subsidies everywhere. We need to push politicians away from lobbying and give them the support they need to be firm with the 1%.

It is if you consider the cost of the redundancy required for renewable energy to serve as base load once you cut oil, gass and coal out of the supply.

Nuclear can cover this base load until we develop better storage systems for large scale use.

If we had just built nuclear with the modern architecture developed in the 70’s onwards we’d be able to move away from fossile fuel FAAR more easily today, without any mjor disasters from the reactor technology from the 50’s.

I don’t have the app, and searching for “gemini” only gives “gemini settings” which when clicked opens the promt of “do you accept changing Google assistant to gemini”, clicking “not now” just sends me back to setting search.

And a few fines to popular websites and news reports about it and people will start to learn what the law is and don’t implement meta haphazardly. “just happen” will quickly turn to “rarely happens” once it becomes enforced.

Also install consent-o-matic, it handles the popup of most popular websites by default without tweaking ubo.

Fired for not writing the quota number of lines even junior devs manage to hit.

No. You can have an opinion, but that doesn’t prove it isn’t settled in facts.

Well, that’s exactly what Trump said would happen, so why would they think otherwise?

If they could read they would be upset by that.

"there is plenty more but you have seen all the important stuff - go outside and do something "

That is lemmy for me. I have removed communities I don’t want to see, and subscribed to a lot of them and sort by hot.

Once the posts start losing quality (up votes) I move on.

It’s a showerthought about the English spellings being fucked.

You read read as read, and not as read.

Listening to the same song over and over is no longer for enjoyment, it is for the feelings of safety that your body is comfortable in.

Well, they /are/ self regulated. Just not the way that anyone but them wants.

Just don’t leave them in the sink and you can do the same with multiple of each, saving you the wash up. Just out them straight into the dishwasher. Saves energy, water and time.

Shoot an insurance ceo and your votes will go up.

Chatgpt answer:

Yes, “reckful” is a real word, although it is rarely used in modern English. It means being thoughtful, careful, or prudent, essentially the opposite of “reckless.” It comes from the same root as “reck,” which means to care or pay attention to.

Examples of Usage:

In older texts, “reckful” might describe someone who is cautious or considerate of consequences: “He was reckful in his approach, weighing every decision carefully.”

Why It’s Uncommon:

“Reckless” became the dominant term in English, and “reckful” fell out of common usage. Today, terms like “careful,” “prudent,” or “mindful” are more likely to be used in its place.

So while “reckful” is technically correct and would make sense in context, it might sound archaic or poetic to most modern English speakers.

It’s not impossible to counter this while still having text be correct if you use a dialogue model that takes parameters to ue in calculation of the output dialogue.

“Dialogue here should lead you to the {direction}.”

NPC cords, quest objective cords = calculate relative position, insert in dialogue.

The game knows after you take the quest. So it can also know at the moment.

You need to vote for people that will PUT guillotines on the ballot! If there are none, find someone who will, or be the change you want to see.

You can’t do that with personal information like the ones doctors needs transcribed. It has to be local.

I instinctively closed your comment after reading “short attention span” because I knew what you were going to say. Had to go back to comment because I realise the irony.