never been proven

Don’t worry we can check the library of babel for the answer.

Or, it could be the periodicity of the lifecycle of a cool bug they like, or it could be just a random period from any huge number of celestial objects we have yet to categorize. I have a guess for which of these options it is, personally.

Doesn’t actually mean their eardrums didn’t rupture from the airpods, just that under those testing conditions they can’t generate the imposed constraint of 130 dB.

You can get some information of the musculature from the bone structure, attachments are often fairly visible. But fatty tissue and skin, plus the uncertainty of the musculature still, all combine to be fairly high uncertainty ya.

It has everything to do with tech literacy. Understanding how to use technology includes the consequences of that use.

Sure I’ll take the discussion more seriously: I don’t know what your experiences were and im sure you have valid reasons to be upset. But your comment makes no indication of these experiences, and I’m not expecting you to share them, you make no indication of wanting to.

Projecting those traumas into a cudgel with which to judge strangers harshly on a whim however is going to be behavior that gets pushback. I don’t think that child has unloving parents, nor deserves to be taken to a new family because the parents made a mistake they clearly learned from. I think they broadly reacted well to the situation in a system (surveillance capitalism) which does a poor job, possibly an actively malicious job, of educating people about the downsides of existing in and using features of that system. Maybe they, if digging deeper, have failed to learn or are in fact unloving. But based on the information available, I don’t think that’s a fair assessment.

I hope you are doing well and wish you luck handling your past and your goals related to it.

Just wait until you hear about all the ways parents used to also fail their children.

Technological literacy is ideal, but lacking it is hardly a failure of character.

This wasn’t a study and nobody has proven free will one way or another, the issue remains heavily semantic.

Scientists can have opinions and beliefs. A news organization encouraging it as being a scientific conclusion only because it comes from a scientist is really the issue here.

Big meh. Languages evolve.

What

While more on the parent side of the age gap of things now, I know at least five offspring personally who do this willingly. It is a nightmare to me, moreso the fact that it’s basically impossible or was the last time I looked to find ways to do it that are foss.

But the point is, probably more people do it than you expect. This place is a selection bias, most people genuinely give no rats ass about their privacy, and, to the shock of many, trust their parents and like the safety net.

There are certainly secure privacy focused approaches they retain the agency of both parties which could exist. It’s a very real niche.

It’s been acknowledged in western cuisine forever too lol. You think western chefs just could’ve put a finger on meat char tasting good across all of human history??

No it’s just that it was discovered to be a fundamental receptor on the tongue which responds to amino acids. It was discovered by a Japanese researcher. The weird eastern exceptionalism is just silly if you take five seconds to look into why it’s named umami.

Additionally some compounds don’t become aromatic until they are dissolved in spit or digested by enzymes in your mouth. There’s also bitterness, which detects stuff associated strongly with poison.

Yes. Tons of evidence. As others have said what you perceive as flavor is mostly several thousand or so distinct chemical receptors in your nose firing off based on the aromas of the food.

It’s certainly legitimate in the metaphysics sense but it’s unfalsifiable, which limits what can actually be done with the idea.

Written content can contain pii, but it’s rarer. Written content isn’t, by default, pii, but if someone tells anything reasonably pii the entire text can be consisted pii even when anonymized.

You just don’t digest as much nor store as much calories. So your feces and urine, as well as exhalation.

It’s not cheating basic physics, there’s just a lot of misunderstanding about how weight works in biology. Cico is not what many people believe it to be.

And an important note is that… For decades we have had paper trails fairly locked down given enough incentive. The technology isn’t the problem with performing audits.

I doubt it

It has been demonstrated time and time again that social graph fingerprinting is not only widespread but extremely effective.

your only way of circumventing it is not to use social media

This article literally demonstrates a way of circumventing it. Blocking all instances that federate with threads.

Additional tracking options can further improve your privacy and difficulty to be fingerprinted in general, things like librewolf, for example.

Linux basedphones os will surely pop up rapidly if that were to happen at least.