• 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 26th, 2023

help-circle



  • “Objective worth” is a bit of an oxymoron, because worth is up to your value judgment.

    If you’re questioning the “evolutionary imperative” that organisms want to pass on genes - one fairly human trait is that a lot of us can consciously diverge from that instinct, either fulfilling that need by passing on our legacies socially rather than genetically, or just not looking to pass anything on at all.

    Something we have in common with other mammals is we prioritize whatever experience is in front of us. Anyone who’s directly affected by catastrophes and strife will have different beliefs than people who aren’t.

    So if objective worth has no neat answer, what’s left?

    I’d say it’s interesting to have so many different subjective experiences in one world, with a language-based society able to communicate and share many more varied experiences than most animals. Interesting isn’t inherently good or bad, but if nothing was good nor bad then nothing would be interesting.

    So yea. Human life is entertaining. We’ve got that going for us!

    P.S. If you’ve ever lived in a city whose infrastructure is strained by overpopulation, you don’t necessarily view declining/shifting populations as a bad thing.








  • You seem eager to pose this “if the product was undamaged” as if you can quantify what might have happened differently, but then in a comment below you ask someone else to prove that maintainers left.

    It might shock you to learn that products are developed by people. Actual people stay or leave and work wildly differently based on things like respect, expectations, and being in a hostile environment.

    Want proof of that? Go work on an actual project with a team sometime.

    edit - And this isn’t even accounting for the ways toxic communication impedes wider adoption of a product