new profile: /u/antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
besides the elite class of your country controls what happens in your country (media included), you have no say in it.
Is there any state, current or historical, that was not a dictatorship according to this metric?
Edit: ignore the question, I noticed the Stalin profile pic
That’s two twitter clones from two tech billionaires in just six months. Capitalism truly breeds innovation.
What’s the other Twitter clone (other than Threads)?
Bookwyrm is open-source, works similarly to Lemmy (i.e. is a federated platform). Storygraph and LibraryThing are also popular alternatives, but IIRC they’re both closed source.
Personally I think just creating a spreadsheet file with your reading data is better. (In LibreOffice, of course.)
These are the same types of people that caused the civil war.
I’m far from an expert on American history, but I’m 100% sure that no civil war was caused just by unorganised morons who like to wave their guns.
The existence of Lemmy is a testament to this.
Lemmy has existed before the reddit shitshow.
Ruining this year’s /r/place
Easy there, Robespierre. You won’t “ruin” r/place by creating some tiny logo that will be scrubbed away by the moderators in five minutes.
Ehh, flags dominated since the very first r/place.
But yes it’s pretty obvious each new edition is ever more astroturfed. The second one had lots of obvious organised bots designing perfect shapes and logos, and moderators’ meddling was noticed as well.
Oh damn, I did realise it’s working again a few days ago, so I just assumed Twitter is open too.
Didn’t work when they blocked non-registered visitors.
This will just turn the site into a massive shill fest full of people pandering
Ummm…
no anonymity
I doubt that Instagram users who willingly install an another app made by Facebook care about that lol
fck you descriptivist
You mean prescriptivist? 😅
(beep boom I’m a human)
Not quite. When I used to care and kind of tried to distort the training data, I would always select one additional picture that did not contain the desired object, and my answer would usually be accepted. I.e. they were aware that the images weren’t 100% lined up with the labels in their database, so they’d give some leeway to the users, letting them correct those potential mistakes and smooth out the data.
That’s your assumption. Had you not clicked on the van, maybe it would’ve let you through anyway, it’s not necessarily that strict. Or it would just give you a new captcha to solve. Either way, if your answer did not line up with what the system expected (your assumption being that they had already classified it as a bus) it would call attention to the image. So, they might send it over to a real human to check what it really is, or put it into some different combination with other vehicles to filter it out and reclassify.