61·
1 year agoOh, thats good to know, can you provide more detail?
autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]
A real autism! He/him bisexual man that might be a demiboy but probably not. I like media. Extraordinarily DILF.
- 0 Posts
- 20 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
Cake day: September 8th, 2020
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Yes, they’re an ideologically committed centrist liberal to a pretty extreme degree. The absolute refusal to accept the crimes of liberal capitalism as anything but “mistakes” that they “learned from” is pretty detached from reality.
Perfect example! Winston Churchill was a racist who committed intentional genocide in India.
And he wasn’t just “making mistakes”. He was an evil man doing evil things on purpose.
You’re just constantly and tiringly arguing from the assumption that liberals are only ever bad because they “made mistakes” but I swear they mean well and are trying to do the right thing! Despite the incredible death toll that can be laid at their feat.
But communists are malicious and trying to do evil.
Every time.
Liberals dismantled those colonial empires.
This is the same argument as “but whites also FREED the slaves” and “but men also GAVE the women the vote”.
Cuba.
Its only whataboutism to you because we are applying the same standard to liberal countries you are to communist ones.
Also America has NOT grown and learned from the internment camps.
You know the western powers signed non agression pacts with Nazi Germany too right? And then did appeasment?
This is just ahistorical in like 5 different ways I wouldn’t even know where to begin, nor do I consider you worth it. Have fun.
And I don’t tend to play nice with bloodthirsty fascists
Thats our attitude as well. Your problem is that you think the people who have been historically proven to be better at fighting fascism are the actual fascists. Its enlightened centrist garbage.
I don’t really love everything the USSR did either. I think the population transfers were generally a pretty bad thing. But I don’t do that both sides shit.
I can’t “brigade” a post thats literally on my front page and which the admin explicitly invited us to participate in.
Conflict isn’t and will remain not abuse. And looking at your post history, you’ve said plenty of mean things to people on hexbear in their own goddamn instance so don’t try to take the moral highground there buddy.
abusive
I know my instance is blocked and you probably won’t see this, but as a parental abuse survivor I really take issue with this trivialization of abuse.
https://arsenalpulp.com/Books/C/Conflict-Is-Not-Abuse
And neither is disagreement.
I won’t pretend that hexbear comments are not sometimes mean. But calling them “abusive” is just trivialization .
We criticize liberalism from the left though. I understand that you’re not used to that but liberalism is not actually the leftmost part of the political spectrum. Its also worth noting that when we say “liberalism” we include both what you understand to be “liberals” and “conservatives” because thats what the word originally meant. It just meant “supporter of capitalism”. We have significant issues with the Democratic Party (and the equivalent parties in other first world nations) though and don’t pretend otherwise, but all those criticisms are coming from Marxist perspectives.
I’m not even going to get into it with the “pro fascism” part because I know this is almost certainly based on a misunderstanding of what fascism. Hexbear is explicitly anti-fascist, as are all communists except those weirdo MAGA communists of which there are like 10.
No the person just described how lemmy works and how people find posts and you’re still treating it like a conspiracy to brigade. Where on our platform are there calls to action to “brigade” this post or any other? Hexbear’s algorithm doesn’t work any different from any other instance.
Maaaaaan come ooooooon this is literally just how the platform works what the hell?
Someone here admitted that it was them.
CW: CSA
spoiler
Its honestly even more unfathomable to imagine talking people out of it in the case of what instance is being discussed for defederation here: an instance with a comm for pedophiles who are pro-contact and think children can consent. You can’t fucking debate a pro-contact pedophile out of being pro-contact. I’m a strong rehabilitationist so I wouldn’t want to execute them and would consider chemical castration a last resort (also, whats the science on that? does that even work?) so I would go with isolation from society where they can’t hurt kids and deep, deep fucking therapy, and possibly restorative justice if they have actually victimized anyone. But individuals online are not going to convince a fucking pro-contact pedophile that sex with kids is wrong. And you definitely aren’t going to be able to use debate to get them to stop being attracted to kids in the first place.
Like, fuck, if the comm was for anti-contact pedophiles who strictly gather for the purpose of supporting each other in remaining strong in their convictions, then I wouldn’t want to nuke the community from existence (as long as thats ALL its for, and they arent like sharing fantasies with each other and other shit). Still wouldn’t want to be federated with them though. Don’t want to see that shit.