I don’t disagree. But I’m pretty sure this was intended to be done on the election year. Don’t get me wrong, I will not vote for the orange fuzz ball with a gun to my head. But this could’ve been done earlier in his term

Thousands. There was a point in time last year or whenever where that number was 100 or 1000 or even 1.

Could’ve pardoned that person then.

Quick question

Why didn’t he do that 3 years ago when he got into office

Now put in a law saying you can’t do that

For uploading game clips I’d assume

I’m giving it to my brother. Or just sell it for $100 to yourself

If someone buys a home that was rented. Would the cap apply to them? Because this might result in a loophole

For us to do so yes. For the government, it constantly breaks the law

Funny-ly enough you can block their signal. Issue is it’s also going to block everyone within range

GLBTA? I honestly thought you were spelling something out with that

I don’t think giving ownership to accounts like shares would work. But probably employees owned

I understand for the life of the company. But it’s not even my steam account. It’s my child’s who’s currently -5 years old (give or take). I did create it on their behalf a decade ago to redeem the free games on their behalf and gift them games I think they’ll enjoy.

Oh I didn’t own my steam account it was created for my future children. it’s a trust.

The ad design could link to the products and out of Netflix. So they wouldn’t get clicks

Idk I didn’t have expertise in this space

Took me a minute to figure out why these 2 updates would be bundled together. Must be cause if you downloaded something you’d be able to bypass their ads

Power in the US is held within an oligarchy and when they are threatened people get disappeared. There’s examples of that but one that’s being made an example of in broad daylight is Julian Assange

I understand that. But building chargers using their ports is an option and will be something that happens. It just answers the customers of other OEMs of whether to charge their cars now. And even if Tesla controls a significant portion of the charging infrastructure now there’ll be others that build chargers with that standard with time. And I’m sure there was some closed door agreement they came up with on pricing

It’s a headstart for a robust charging network while other charging station companies build more to catch up

How many ccs chargers are there compared to nas? That’s the question that matters to GM Ford and other automakers

I didn’t really follow. Because the way it happened was, Tesla can make money from it’s charging stations and other OEMs get a robust charging network.