![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
The sad reality with decent judges. They don’t force their ideals like the corrupt ones do.
The sad reality with decent judges. They don’t force their ideals like the corrupt ones do.
Maybe it’s time to unsubscribe from lemmy.world
Too bad democracy won’t invade like Putin does because peace is the right thing to do.
“Don’t genocide! Stop genocide now, and I will give you our genocide funding!”
“Btw. our patrons support your genocide, and so we are labeling any peace calls as antisemitism.”
Netanyahu must be laughing about the situation.
Nah, the merit of this for the CCP is to seize control of Africa. Worth every yuan.
!news in my TL is like !nottheonion these days.
And conservatives all over the world still want to install Trump as POTUS, let alone the American ones.
That’s a concern people had when things transitioned outside the US.
During the pandemic, those under 40, many flush with stimulus checks, took to the stock market and saw big gains.
Yoh… u alllll did dis!? I envy u!!!
I’m a fellow human being living outside America
So, if you’re in a hell of a pain that will continue to your death 50 years later, you don’t qualify. I don’t really understand the rationale here.
“I believe that I have done so. However, being human, I have also faltered.”
Maybe I’m not a human, but I wouldn’t laugh about a prosecutor’s dick while being a supreme court judge hearing a murder case…
Remove Trump or not, this originalist SCOTUS might remove Biden just because he is a Democrat.
Biden says legal actions, but shouldn’t he stop playing nice with the supreme court in the first place?
Edit: I mean that maybe he can do things like targeting their patrons, banning gifts etc.
The justices will wrestle with whether a provision of the 14th Amendment aimed at keeping former officeholders who “engaged in insurrection” can be applied to Trump
No problem for the originalists cuz there was no Twitter when 14 was written. /s
Isn’t the reason, instead, that they admitted the weak sales?
In the USA, you may get shot by a policeman by answering a welfare check.
It’s stupid. Imagine the presidential immunity were a thing: POTUS could hold a press conference, rape a reporter in front of cameras, kill her husband at the same time, and nobody would be allowed to stop it.
Takeshi’s Challenge made it to smartphones. Maybe it’s time for me to try it finally after 38 years.
Democrats filed their latest lawsuit the day after the Wisconsin Supreme Court flipped to majority liberal control in August after the election win by Justice Janet Protasiewicz. Her vote was the difference maker in the 4-3 December ruling tossing the Republican maps.
WHAT CAN REPUBLICANS DO?
Republicans are running out of options to stop the lines from being redrawn. They argued Protasiewicz shouldn’t hear the lawsuit because she said during her campaign that the GOP-drawn maps were “rigged” and “unfair.” But she did not recuse herself. Now Republicans are talking about raising that issue, and others, in an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court alleging due process violations.
Poor argument of Republicans even by the Republican standard, but then again SCOTUS is hypocritical at the moment.
Reddit for reference