![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
You think the ones who escape are going to turn over a new leaf? Or the ones looking on from without?
You think the ones who escape are going to turn over a new leaf? Or the ones looking on from without?
Now we know why Israel has been so reluctant to send military aid to Ukraine. They’ve been saving it for a special occasion.
Probably this guy was already on someone’s radar and they were just waiting for him to fuck around. Then they let him find out.
Hardly anyone is streaming it. It’s the same cringy dialogue with the same boring game as its predecessors. I haven’t seen anything in any of the streams that would change my mind.
Why hasn’t anyone argued that guns like this are not arms, but decorations and props which don’t deserve amendment protection?
Exqueese me? I thought he was great in bg3.
If only it was the jets that are affected!
It’s brilliant. Let’s hope the taxes are actually spent as intended.
The issue is with the specific protocol being used. It’s not made public or documented. It’s almost all though they’re interested in torturing him instead of humanely executing him.
If people haven’t figured out how to mitigate rejection of implants to at least 99% they shouldn’t even be attempting this kind of nonsense.
I remember reading last year that all the assistant services like Alexa and Siri and Google are costing these companies a fortune with almost zero return. It’s not surprising they’re looking for additional revenue streams.
Again, you’re wrong. It’s easier to kill people with a gun than a bat or a knife. My point is that this case shouldn’t be a situation calling for the castle doctrine (based on the text) because other avenues for dealing with the situation existed and were possible. In that case, I’d rather be charged with assault than murder.
You ever use a bat or knife to kill a person? Way harder than squeezing a trigger, friend.
Heavy vibes from Ƭ̵̬̊, the artist formerly known as Prince.
Opening the door may have saved everyone in this case.
Did they try to communicate with the person? Look through the widow to see whether the person is armed? Flee? Get a non lethal weapon like a bat, knife, pepper spray? Hide? There was time for the home owner to go get a gun before the window broke. I assume, since this is USA, that it was already loaded (😂) so I’m sure it didn’t take too long, but did they try ANY of those things? Unlikely, and that’s unfortunate.
The guy at the door was not an immediate threat to life or limb, save his own. Firing a gun was not justified without threat, IMO. But I guess in the USA you can murder people to save your property (not your life).
When the effort to maintain the automation outstrips the benefit. This can happen often in dynamic environments with many moving parts.
I once worked a call centre during late shift and my manager asked us to clean the bathrooms. I told him they can hire a janitor because I won’t be cleaning anything since I wasn’t hired to clean. Didn’t have to clean the bathrooms. Sometimes standing up for yourself works
Revenue. Doesn’t matter what they’re worth.