He must be a real good paleontologist to forget that wood is a bad conductor.
Being above the fray is what the Supreme Court was intended to be, so you can’t fault people for initially assuming that.
I think most people actually do.
Since the Roe v Wade verdict was leaked, I feel like the media has been glossing over the revelation that there’s just as much wheeling and dealing in the Supreme Court as in any of the other branches.
Why are we giving Trump an excuse to drop his failure of a running mate?
Keep talking, dumbass. Let’s see how many swifties you can make turn out.
internal communication on platforms like Slack is not always private
That’s common sense, frankly.
I see what you dad there.
My great grandpa ingested dihydrogen monoxide every day of his life, often more than once. And now he’s dead.
Sounds like a confession.
We finally got him, right guys? Guys?
It makes sense to have the option, but this trend of signing away your rights in the fine print should be outlawed.
This is why they’re weird. They were bragging about Project 2025 a few months ago, because since everyone in their little far right bubbles wanted authoritarianism, they assumed normal people did.
Give the poor guy a break, he’s been bribed so many times it’s hard to keep track of it all.
“Dodge” implies a degree of finesse. He’s throwing a temper tantrum. Again. Because he’s afraid he’s gonna lose unless he gets to pick the referee.
Do you think it encourages people to be kind when they do something charitable and get told “Yeah, no, fuck you still”?
The “people are generally decent but the system is not” timeline.
Funny how often those go together.
If Trump doesn’t win, it’ll just become Project 2029.
It’s nice to see Democrats properly demonizing a Republican agenda into a standalone buzzword, the way Republicans do with a new variations of “equality” every year (woke, DEI, etc.)