

I work for a living, so I’m used to my work being exploited as a matter of course.
I work for a living, so I’m used to my work being exploited as a matter of course.
Nah mate. Information is free the second it leaves its source. Any attempt to curtail it after then is just a cunt’s trick.
I prefer my mechanical stress calculations in millidynes per square kiloparsec thank you very much.
France and Germany are using in ovo sexing since 2022, there is a total ban on chick culling in both countries, and a lot of EU countries are planning to follow them.
It’s the one bright side of that wiki article.
(It’s also mad that France led the way on humane treatment of food animals, see: gavage; ortolan bunting)
The one you’re too lazy to search?
You’re saying that social media is not the real cause of the youth mental health crisis? Do you propose a different cause? Because I know of a good few, very well-qualified people (of varying ages) that might explicitly disagree with you…
There’s also the fact that they are too explosive to conform to flight safety standards.
I wish more people realised this. Well said comrade.
That’s great I love it. I do the opposite, I like to give banal items overly technical names. Chair=orthogonal spinal support unit. Hammer=non-calibrated adjustment appliance, etc.
I’m not usually that guy but this seems to be the thread for it. Initialisms and acronyms are both types of abbreviation, where you pronounce acronyms as a word (NASA) and initialisms as individual letters (FBI).
I’ve had meetings at work over this. I had to draw a flow chart.
That’s happened in french and Italian too then, “une orange” and “un’arancia”. Wild.
You wouldn’t download an car
Upper-class British used to ‘drop the h’ on words with a french root to show off their education. Historic had a silent H but hawk did not, for example.
Side note: H has a silent H, it’s “aitch” not “haitch”.
You missed the main one🤌🤌ma che cazzo
That’s why they stopped at three. The fourth bridge always takes forever to paint.
I think it’s just an assumption based on the mode of society at that time in history. If it was built in the 12th century it was built by what we would now consider slaves. In the 1100s the land was divided into fiefs and the lord of that land considered the people who lived and worked on the land as part of that land: serfs. Unless this bridge was an exception to the rule, then serfs would have undertaken all the labour that got it built.
It sounds like I imagine his internal monologue sounds, given the stuff he actually lets through whatever is left of his pr filter.
Is this real? I can’t find this tweet
Yes. But I’m not paid continuously for the work I’ve done in the past, and I’m not paid the actual value of my work.
Should we still be paying Homer for his incredible work on the Iliad, do you think?