I had fully understood what you wanted to mean, even though phrased badly. However the reason I quoted it is because of how contradictory is your thought process.

I personally blocked it because I want to talk to everyone on lemmy

Genius

They voluntarily put webcams in their houses with several known security issues which transmit everything open in the cloud. And they purposefully have a listening device which transmits to Amazon whatever they talk about in order to be able to listen to music without having to use a mouse or tap on a screen.

But having an ID with a photo on it? That’s where they put the line

And the “would of” thing

You mean it is hard for you to execute it?

Where exactly was the good idea?

Yeah but this is in the area of unpaid labor. You “had to” solve a captcha in order they let you use another service. You are not visiting a page with the sole purpose of voluntarily solving captchas

easier to have posts be given tags

If this is not being done automatically by the server by analysing the content, people will not use tags, or use irrelevant tags, or fill it with tens of tags like Instagram’s early days or whatever else I cannot think of now. But I think it is not easy to work as intended

And this is why they focus and promote the podcasts so much. Podcasts don’t have any label intermediate

Awesome, now you get only subconscious messages flashed in your eyes.

What else are people going to do to avoid installing Firefox?

I suppose it depends on your system’s abilities, but my guess would had been that you get all frames but for shorter period of time

Chromium comes straight out of Google though. It is not another browser. It is the same engine. They give their engine for free and different companies use it to make their own flavors of the engine of the “Google browser”.

They’re actually increasing the market share of their browser engine by having chromium open source.This is not competition.

Mozilla has good lawyers too.

Google is not funding Firefox only for the search engine being default. Google needs to keep Firefox alive because it is their sole competitor. If Firefox (Mozilla) goes down, Google can be accused for monopoly practices which is something they want to avoid.

If YouTube operates at a loss and they decide to ditch their service its their problem, not mine. I’m not here to save google

Well actually they can do much more, like for example decreasing quality to lets say 144p

I’m not saying that adblockers will not be able to bypass it, maybe there will be a solution as well, but wanted to say that the blank screen waiting is not their only weapon

How else will the AI be able to recognize that such text is “bad”?

Yes but these blank accounts will cease to be blank after these users start having conversations which use the middleman. And the middleman will have access to them…

Irrelevant?

Are you the same people that say that by banning fascists you’re also becoming fascist?

totaly agree. Additionally if I see a post/comment with racist/fascist/sexist views I want to know what the general consensus is. It makes a difference knowing that people disagree or support.