Nothing. For one, it won’t let you enter letters. Two, the table structure to these POS systems are more nuanced than a simple bills table with am amounts field.

It’s amusing and all, but it’s not something you can do.

Source: work with, and develop around, these types of POS systems.

To shreds, you say?

Excuse me?? A reply by THE Alex Sadler about the TV show Chuck?? I think I can turn off the Internet for the day. I’m satisfied.

The way to fix a pad-bottom is simple! Just give the next element a negative margin-top!

Easier to replace the light switch at that point

🌎🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

Oh I don’t own the stock. But you can’t deny that it’s been a great asset for anyone that got in early. Saying it’s down 30% from 6 months ago without looking at the big picture is short sighted.

Also, fuck Elon

zooms out 5 years

Up nearly 800%

Yooo hooo

Are you making a suggestive cat call? Or do you just like the chocolate beverage 😊

Have you tried eating a ginger? May also help.

My step mom’s step cousin

… But now I’m suuuuuuper curious

I hear they’re allergic to classrooms now

He’s getting down voted because most people in this thread are foaming at the mouth.

I hate trump as much as the next guy. What this guy did, tho, is currently against the law. Should the law be changed? Should he have gone through a whistle blower process? Questions to be asked.

But as of today, you can’t purposely get a job at the IRS to leak information that the IRS wasn’t ready/allowed to release. Full stop.

The folks arguing here that he should be pardoned or who are enraged that he is even being charged are presenting childish arguments. There’s a theme on Lemmy that I’ve noticed. Tribalism is strong as fuck.

The adblock changes is a shit stain, absolutely agree with you there.

For my household, personally, it won’t make a difference because I have a pihole blocking everything from all devices. So that change isn’t enough to persuade me to make a move.

But yes, anyone who doesn’t have pihole of and uses adblockers, it will be 100% understandable for them to jump ship.

One thing I miss about Reddit is the vetting of news sites on the major news sub.

Whether right or wrong, this “news” article comes off as pretentious and childish.

I just want facts. If I’m reading the news, I want the facts from the news site, and I’ll get the opinions from forums.

For the overwhelming majority of users, they won’t know the difference between using the two. People here are on a high inhaling the air in this echo chamber.

I’ve used Chrome on every device imaginable since Chrome was a thing. I’ve had a negligible amount of problems, in all my years. I absolutely hate that Google shuts services down when they get bored. And I absolutely hate what they did with Google Music and Google Chats, and Domains.

I move off Google services when they shut down. Besides that, I’ve no problems with the ones I use (minus nitpicks and the above products).

So to anyone here feeling bad and are afraid to comment on here because they don’t want to lose Internet points, fret not. There are millions of us perfectly satisfied using Google, PAYING for their services where we see fit, and generally not worrying at all about any of this.

I’m no law expert, but I have dealt with POS and retailers, and their tax people. My understanding is that you always report the loading of a gift card as a liability. It may be categorized as a different liability because you don’t necessarily owe that money back. As in, most gift cards are non refundable.

When the holder of the gift card redeems it for products, the balanced used gets deducted from your liability and is added to revenue.

If Starbucks were straight reporting it as revenue with no explanation, I can see that being scrutinized. But if they are reporting it as potential revenue, then that’s up to shareholders to weed through that and make investments based on that.

I’m not understanding the illegality here.

Thank you for the citation and explanation.

I know I’m coming off all boot-licky, but this all seems legal. If Starbucks is disclosing the gift card amount as a potential to be moved from a liability to revenue, and if this is legal in tax laws, then this lawsuit is overreach and makes it seem like they’re just looking for a payout.

It’s been pointed out already that you can use the remaining balance of a gift card to zero it out and pay whatever is left in the order with another means of payment.

This lawsuit is describing how gift cards work. Might as well sue all merchants.

They didn’t provide proof of that allegation. At least, not in this article. The consumer group alleges that Starbucks claims unused gift card balances as revenue. Are we sure they aren’t showing a liability for the respective amount? I didn’t look through their corporate filings, and the article doesn’t provide citations from public filings. Just accusations.