He’s one of the “I don’t want to see something so neither should anyone else” crowd.
He’s one of the “I don’t want to see something so neither should anyone else” crowd.
This is part of why it’s better to have users block servers instead of servers block servers.
Laymen.
I only come here now.
“Never negotiate with your abuser.”
Meh. Very little sympathy for people betting their livelihood on proprietary technologies.
No, they don’t care.
They care about optics, which they’ve concluded will make them more money than logic or reason.
🥱
Meh. I think if users focused more on blocking what they don’t want to see instead of defederating, then this wouldn’t be an issue.
This is only a problem if you’re one of the children who thinks: “I don’t want to see something, so neither should anyone else.”
That would be a great feature.
Thank you for sharing this.
I’ve been looking for an instance that protects free speech.
Edit: It would be nice if we could sign up without giving a rationale.
The more the merrier.
You can move to smaller universes if that’s what you see fit.
You can always have your own universe within the fediverse.
I don’t think viewing someone as suspicious is the same as them attacking you.
These businesses care a lot about presentation.
While it would be nice if people viewed wearing masks in a restaurant as cleaner and more-inviting, that’s just not the case.
People have evolved to become suspicious of those who cover their faces.
Chains like these care a lot about consistency across their brand.
You can choose to be on smaller instances that only federate with smaller instances.
Having more people gives us more options.